You still insist to read the text from ArM5 p.83 as an itemized list. But you give no reason why it should be one.
I suggest that this must include the circumstance of a Hermetic spell cast using the None modifiers from that table directly above that's already being considered by the author. There are no words or gestures to recognize, yet the target maga still has a chance via Awareness roll to make out the Form.
Under this reading of the rules, there must be a mechanism that magi are using other than seeing and hearing gestures and words.
And now you draw a conclusion from your assumption of an itemized list, which leads to a direct contradiction with
Exotic Casting (Minor, Hermetic)[/i] (underscore mine)"]The magus uses non-Hermetic methods to cast Hermetic spells. While he still needs to employ obvious ritual actions, these are not the same words and gestures taught as part of Magic Theory within the Order, and other magi who are unfamiliar with the magus’s tradition find it very hard to recognize which spell he is casting. Any attempt to determine the Form of his magical effect (ArM5, page 83) is made against an Ease Factor of 15, without the magnitude of the effect being subtracted from this Ease Factor as normal.
Exotic Casting reads
In other circumstances, the maga must work the Form out. A Perception + Awareness roll against an Ease Factor of 15 minus the magnitude of the effect is needed.
as referring to working out the Form of the spell being cast from words and gestures of the caster. So your assumption of an itemized list in the text is falsified.
Nothing new here: this was already explained less tediously and more concisely here and here. Can we now stop this boring carousel?
Cheers