Automatic counterspelling talisman

You still insist to read the text from ArM5 p.83 as an itemized list. But you give no reason why it should be one.

And now you draw a conclusion from your assumption of an itemized list, which leads to a direct contradiction with

Exotic Casting reads

as referring to working out the Form of the spell being cast from words and gestures of the caster. So your assumption of an itemized list in the text is falsified.

Nothing new here: this was already explained less tediously and more concisely here and here. Can we now stop this boring carousel?

Cheers