Up through apprenticeship up. Might need to go revisit his background a bit, but overall I think there is enough to get a feel for the character.
How much post gauntlet time should I write narrative for to be in sync with the game?
My design goal was/is Mercurian Magic and Great Talisman.
Is there a restriction in place? A man should know these things!
I can understand either way. It is nice to get a build done that you want. And yet I do tend to think people underplay the depth/commitment and whatnot of Mystery Cults and the process of Initiation itself. I don't think I'm aiming for a lot, but I don't want to take anything that was denied to everyone else already either.
Any critique or advice for how I have things so far? Can always use a second set of eyes in Ars!
Good to see you joining in here man.
Also...
I'm biased but I love summoners. One of my favorite archetypes. But I did say I am biased.
I've run into this myself, so I don't know that I expect everyone to think like I do about them.
I think a lot depends on how it is done. There aren't a lot details about your idea here yet. Care to expound a bit more?
Indeed, that was the result of the discussion. And no, that hasn't changed. 
Any other advice/concerns for me?
A few things ended up scattered through the forum. From the top of my head (if I find the missing links I'll link them later):
- Post Gauntlet Guidelines
- House Rules (we have just one up till now)
- Up to 10 years of post gauntlet advancement.
- No initiation before play, but you can surely deepen your connections and lay the groundwork.
Thanks for the welcome folks! And I'd be happy to expand more shortly Vort, I just want to get some thoughts on a thing or two before I jump too deeply into a concept is all!
So the big one I have at present is about a focus. Thinking about a focus in Spirit Magic, and wanted to gauge reaction on what it would cover. By RAW, a minor would cover the ReVi guidelines that involve summoning/commanding/warding against spirits. Well, that and if I were to bind a spirit as a familiar using ReVi.
So then the question becomes, what if I try to make it a major? Would that cover summoning spell spirits from Hermetic Theurgy? While it's arguably far less broad than plenty of the majors listed in the core rules, the biggest complaint I could see is that it could in theory, cover a ton of other guidelines from just that "one". On the flip side, there's the fact that you would still need the arts in question, and are subject to the significant restrictions that come along with spell spirits (extremely limited pen, taking twice as long to cast, no rituals, etc). Honestly, you'd probably be better off finding a spirit capable of casting and or sponting what you want and binding them into service with ReVi instead of bothering with a spell spirit, but I digress.
Again, just trying to be upfront and having any necessary discourse with the troupe before diving too deep. Better to do it now and prevent any hard feelings from anyone after the fact, ya know?
Looking at it in isolation (without factoring in something like Theurgy) a Major Focus in Spirit Magic doesn't really even cover a very broad array of magic in base Hermetic effects. Spirit control, spirit summoning, spirit wards, spirit might destruction. Probably detecting spirits. I have trouble of thinking of much else. Compared to RAW foci like Damage, Weather, or Necromancy ... that doesn't seem overpowering to me.
Hermetic Theurgy does kind of change those assumptions, but it comes with its own limiting factors as you point out, and involves a fourth virtue point at least. Spell spirit spells are nifty and it is a versatile style of specialist magic with pros and cons. The biggest "pros" are I think exactly what you are concerned about, the flexibility and being able to take that focus in spirit magic (or something like it) and apply it to a broader array of spells. The cons however are speed, penetration, and that ritual magic takes daimons and not spell spirits. There is also the fact that it still uses the hermetic art combination for whatever effect you want to get a spell spirit for. Whereas you can do much more generic summoning without having that problem if you wanted to focus on ReVi summoning magic. (That has its own complexities and pros/cons of course.) So I think there are subtleties to the pros/cons of this kind of magic, and it certainly doesn't all fall on the positive side. There are real tradeoffs made with going the theurgic route, gains and losses. It is beneficial in my opinion in that it gives you concrete spirits/summons that have very defined abilities, without having to engage in deep character design/building like a full Magic Character writeup.
From my read of the material this seems to be intended functioning. I would readily grant that people can have other takes however.
One thing from my own experience & preference, I have always disliked treating spell spirits as individual spirits that can be killed and now your spirit is gone and your spell design season is now just gone/wasted. I prefer to treat spell spirits as aspects in order to prevent this from occurring.
Is vis income and/or spending for character creation noted anywhere?
Thanks for the thoughtful reply Vort! Hopefully I can get a few more thoughts on the matter, even if it's just indicating that folks don't particularly care. Want to get the troupe's input on the matter before moving forward.
Also check this thread. Seems like 3 pawns is standard?
Thanks! I read and then forgot about that.
Has the value of a Personal Vis Source been set, to modify that with?
Quoting from another topic:
Since you are thinking of an exceptionally versatile Vis Source which would provide different flavors of vis, maybe leaning towards 3 pawns/year is better?
This is kinda my problem with Theurgy. It's unnecesarily complex IMO (even taking into account other methods of summoning) and all it offers is the benefit of FFM (well, there is a couple more benefits, but let's simplify).
Is there any reason for Theurgy instead of other summoning methods, or instead of simply picking FFM?
(Just trying to understand, not to throw sand at the concept.)
Also, albeit this is a minor thing: I like the concept of the saga (revolving around the Laimunt Valley inheritance) and I have a mild concern that too much emphasis in mystery cults will divert from that (not different from what would happen with several characters focused in demonic influence, for example).
This isn't a "I don't want any mystery cult at all", its a "I'm generally more interested in the magi navigating life in the valley instead of navigating their cults".
But this is just me, and my opinion is only as big as anybody else's.
Great find re: vis source quantities.
Well the way I've described it I will grant is flexible but also unpredictable/controllable. To a certain extent he could charge whatever vis he was looking for from customers I suppose but the "I find vis via divination" angle is not something he can control at all. I'm not sure how to reflect such things (random generation comes to mind but might be annoying for all involved as well).
I'm open to suggestions? Or is your suggestion to say "select 3 pawns of desired type" per year, to reflect an abstract/aggregate?
Interesting. To me, the FFM aspect of Theurgy was always more of a secondary benefit. The biggest advantages of Theurgy over other methods are twofold.
-
Daimons. It's the only way to summon them, short of making a trip into their realm. As they can use aspects, trying to use any other method will result in them just blowing up said aspect and probably coming to stomp on you later if you've annoyed them enough. Any daimons get access to some pretty fun and funky magics, what with being capable of replicating ritual effects. Not all are mind you, but still.
-
Spell Spirits. As wonky as they are, it's a very thematic way to get mileage out of any number of summoning oriented virtues/magics. Things like a talisman, a focus, a spirit familiar, etc. I very much have this idea of an older ex-Misc tradition that is barely integrated that has to use spell spirits for all their formulaic spells as they're simply not able to cast otherwise. Again, why I'm trying to talk all this out before pitching the idea as a whole!
Honestly, Theurgy on the whole isn't any more complex than say Sihr, or God help you, the RoP:F stuff. Shoot, probably one of the most straightforward summoning set of powers is Goetia out of RoP:I. Why they never made a comparable magic realm version I don't know, but that's a story for another day.
You say the latter is a minor thing, whereas I view it as a critical one, so thanks for bringing it up! Saga tone is extremely important, and a really quick way to see folks get grumpy, so I'd rather talk about it now so as to make sure I'm not being disruptive! That said, I don't see mystery cults coming to take a dominant position in things given all the potential story hooks. Drive the occasional story, sure, but it's likely to only affect the magus in question, so it's unlikely to suck in others/change the tone of the saga. It's no different than if you had any of the house mystery cults, or even a Tremere, a Q, etc. There are always going to be outside forces, ya know?
That said, don't worry, if my summoner concept doesn't pan out, I have an Auram focused nature lore ex-Misc or a Gifted Mercere wannabe Redcap waiting in the wings, either of whom I suspect would fit in with your view of things quite nicely!
There are really three things that are "upsides" I think. One is the flexibility of a special more general spirit magic system, and applying that spirit magic focus. The others are the Flexible Formulaic as you note, plus also the Spont Spirits are effectively formulaic spont spells in a way. And then access to Daimons for ritual and/or just plain non-hermetic effects from them.
The use of spell spirits as the basic tier of Theurgic magic has real ups and downs as well though. The effectiveness of say a Pilum spirit doesn't scale up with you as you say grow in CrIg total, even though it is still a CrIg spell. And mastering the spell doesn't give mastery of that Pilum, but mastery of summoning your Pilum spirit. Not the same at all. So in many ways it is much more flexible but also defined and limited by special parameters. If you want to be a spell battle master Theurgy is not for you. It does not excel there at all.
I think this is all great/good stuff to hear.
I like the idea of the inheritance and exploring it as well. I think any group of Magi come in with their own goals/ideas, but also that the Covenant itself and its interests and/or strategic situation shapes the game and the path forward. Both if you will create something emergent together.
So for clarity, what kind of stories do you see as fostering the "I'm generally more interested in the magi navigating life in the valley..." line of play? Easier to say when you think you see it (or don't) I would imagine, but I'm willing to say I'm all in for supporting stories that develop the Covenant and local area/interests as well. I think any saga largely would find that ... both unavoidable and rewarding. The Covenant should feature prominently in any game and neglecting it is a mistake!
I just don't know that is all I'm interested in at the same time. I'm not sure what that means for game tone etc. So far I don't think we have any ideas or concepts amongst us that are incompatible interests? (No infernalists trying to sit down and eat with the holy magi... yes I've been there, a long time ago) Granted I'm not deeply familiar with the other characters yet, but I'll give them a solid read some time soon!
My suggestion was made thinking that you can usually exchange 3 pawns of [Te] vis for 3 pawns of [Fo] vis with a redcap, so this isn't that distant from having, say, a source worth 3 pawns intellego and exchanging it as desired whenever there is a redcap nearby. I agree that the flavor should be unpredictable, but in practice I think we can eschew that, since it's reasonable to pay in whatever the contractor requests and he can simply be lucky about finding vis?
From a narrative point of view, I think it could be interesting if fate never brought him a specific kind of vis (eg. he never finds Perdo and no one pays for his services in Perdo, they just don't have it when he requests), but this is just a though. :v
When you put it like that the whole thing makes a lot more sense to me! It's indeed interesting! Would he then have the Cabal Legacy Flaw, to start with Theurgy? I understand this would allow one to bypass the "no initiation before play" limit. And what about the tradition's major non-hermetic virtue?
Thanks for being understanding about my point on mystery cults. I said it's minor because I don't think we are risking to wander too far... but at the same time, if I say nothing I might actualy start to think like that someday. 
I agree that mystery cults don't need to become the center of the saga. It's just that to me they usually seem "bigger", just like demonic influence. But I reckognize this is mostly a matter of perception, and admittedly I haven't dealt much with mystery cults in my home games. Maybe it's the moment to change that?
I'm not even sure how to comment that. XD
I also don't think we have any incompatible characters so far!
Excellent question, and one for which I'm not sure I have a good answer. But I'll try.
Most of the time I've seen mystery cults in play turn out as "this magus has no life outside the cult". The way most cults are written kind of suggest that (to me at least). Assuming this is true (and I fully know it isn't necessarily true, and that my understanding might be biased due to little experience with this) and we have a few mystery cults, we suddenly have some magi playing in a completely different game.
So in a way my comment is an overreaction that amounts to "please don't make everything about the cult".
But again, this is just a biased opinion (that is changing). =]
I appreciate this conversation, it has already allowed me to rethink a few things. And be sure that this isn't me asking anyone to drop your concepts!
That was indeed the plan! Just felt like a very fun and fluffy way of going about things. Massively restrictive too, which was a nice way of addressing any potential complaints about power level.
I'm thinking a hedge tradition out of Novgorod, given that shamanism is very much alive and well in the tribunal (yay steppe nomads!). A spin off from the Volkhv perhaps? Actually the more I noodle on that as it were, the more I like the idea. The Volkhv worship faerie Gods, which are daimons themselves.
Actually leads me to your other question, about the major virtue associated with the tradition. I was thinking Strong Faerie Blood. The idea being that those with the Gift in his tradition are all descended from the local deities and are spirit blooded as it were. Even if I'm not the biggest fan of sympathy traits (Faerie God gives a bonus to one), it feels very right for the concept.
1 Like
I like the idea of barely integrated traditions sometimes. Even if just because they can be flavorful. It is possible to build deep thematic builds with Hermetic Magic, but it can be challenging to do. Especially for people still getting familiar with the rules. Hedge Magic/Traditions evoke a particular feel/tone of characters and magic a lot more strongly much of the time. The Order is supposed to be full of such idiosyncrasies and subtly distinct traditions even within users of Hermetic Magic but often we don't get to see it as strongly as I would like.
On a different note, are there any price guidelines set for purchasing spell instruction with vis? I've been pondering it as I have time to work on Vorsutus and it seems a potentially attractive option.
Alrighty, given that no significant objections have been raised to the concept in broad strokes, I'm going to push ahead with the concept! This is just a basic little blurb, I'm more than happy to expand later. So with that in mind...
Character Name: Vedun
Concept: Ex Misc
Born Kassian Izyaslavovich to a family of foresters along the Ural Mountains, Vedun might have suffered the fate typical to those born with the Gift if it weren't for the fact that his strange eyes, entirely lacking in both iris and pupils, clearly marked him as touched by the fae, and likely as a future Volkhvy. It's not that anyone particularly liked Vedun, but it's more the fact that nobody was willing to risk the wrath of the gods by harming the child.
Growing up would have been a lonely, isolated affair, even by the standards of those living on the outermost fringes of the tribunal, if it weren't for the fact that spirits of all sorts could often be founding milling about the child. Whereas most couldn't stand to be around Vedun for any extended period of time, spirits seemed to be inexorably drawn to him. And so it was with these otherworldly creatures that the child spent most of his time, learning the strange customs of his 'cousins'*
His education would continue uninterrupted for many years until the arrival of Malincka Capcek, a Bonisagus maga attempting to invent a blended theory of Volkhv and Hermetic magic**. Taken to the Thousand Caves covenant, Vedun was trained in the ways of the two traditions, learning much, but most importantly, how to use Hermetic magic to form the bonds with spirits typically associated with the Volhv. Upon successful completion of his Gauntlet (an act that required him to summon and bind a spirit), Vedun took to traveling, first inside the tribunal, but it wasn't long before he was venturing beyond Novgorod's borders.
*As a totally random note, after reading up on the Volkhv, apparently the local faeries address them as cousin. Seemed a cool little bit of fluff.
**Was reading up on the tribunal during the brainstorming process, and found out that this is very much a thing already, so it was perfect.