Ars Magica GRIMOIRE

Ravens are Size -3 (see notes below). Why is this artificially limited to 100? It could handle 200 if you want. It's OK to limit it, though. Also, any Size -3 bird? That's a lot of variety. Usually you at least need a magnitude for complexity/flexibility, but I see none.

I don't like these two spells. Look at the first one. Consider changing it to Touch/Momentary. Now you have a CrAn 15 spell you can cast on a person to do +20 Damage? On top of this damage is creates a massive penalty to Concentration, even if the damage is Soaked? Now bump it up to Voice or Sight and you've got an overly powerful combat spell. Even without the combat issues, this is trying to get around proper Range (should be at least Touch to make this bird; Personal isn't valid) by incurring pain, and it doesn't even use Muto Corpus or anything else like that to try to justify it. These two spells invite huge problems.

Itzhak already pointed out the lack of magnitudes for size. But why are raven-sized birds Size -4??? When I look at the wikipedia page for the common raven, which is presumably this, it says 1.5 to 5 lb. 2 to 5 lb birds, which fits this nearly perfectly, are Size -3. I do see now that Itzhak's Animals of Mythic Europe contains a fan-submitted raven of Size -4, so maybe you got it there; that should ideally be corrected if @Red-Shadow-Claws updates it.

A raven or hawk-sized bird allows for quite a bit of variety. Any bird of Size -3? Usually spells cannot provide this sort of variety, at least not without paying extra magnitudes for complexity/flexibility. And why this +6 bonus? Usually it would be based on Finesse or some Ability. +6 is pretty darn big. Meanwhile, if it's for the Fan Grimoire, it's best not to include the bonus for experimentation, instead including the extra magnitude for the requisite; that way others can work off the spell.

I'm guessing you're artificially limiting this to 100 ravens because you're unlikely to have too many within Voice range to do any control. But there are intangible tunnels, so I still don't know why it's artificially low.

How does the spell know if a wound was taken in animal v. human form? Why is it ineffective against poison and disease? Were these the results of experimentation? On the flip side, who cares about experimentation and the lack of a Corpus requisite; the spell doesn't need a Corpus requisite because of the standard rules. Finally, why are there versions for other Heartbeasts? There really is no need.

End the spell at will? Not only does this disagree with the rules, but the target isn't even in control of the spell. If this were Tethered and Harnessed, sure. If there were a focus to break it, as per

These foci are essential if you are to be able to break the spell in this way.

then it might be reasonable, though there would still be the question of whether Passing the Reins of Corpus would be needed. I could see the focus alone sufficing. But without any of this stuff, the spell breaks rules.

I don't know why the caster's Heartbeast matters, but it's just a limitation to the spell for whatever reason. Maybe it was some experimentation thing.

The base to speak with the animal is 10. It's a whole separate base to sense through its eyes. I don't see the extra magnitude(s) for the added base.

2 Likes