Hello ! For my first message here i would ask you some question.
Despite the fact than i know this forum from a long time, i hadnt the opportunity to really ask something. Well, how times fly.
Im heavily attracted to Diedne story, and also infernalism, i support the story about Diedne were diabolist, but just a minority of them. Im trying to make my pagan Irish verditius magi from hivernian tribunal (filius of Praetorius of verditius) and to bind all ideas together. I read intensivly various subject here about verditius, infernalism, item crafting and so on but nothing in the same post. Im a huge fan of RoP:TI.
I want to use the apotropaic spell guideline with binding rules about magic item and verditius cult mystery Binding magical creature and i dont know if it is possible rulewise. Optimise all i can between verditius and the "good" side of venatores if it follow the concept of Diedne and druidism.
In my mind if i find a demon, i can bind it in a item(MuVim spell), "opening" the item for (demon Might x 5) spell level. Then i can use the same demon Might for enchanting the item. I think half the demon might for "opening" and half the demon might for the effect and im good.
What is your opinion about this ?
Of course he has chtonic magic, affinity and potent magic theory, affinity with vim, minor magical focus (binding demon), apt student (because oral tradition for druidism), lucky and inventive genius (i hope i can use the lucky bonus when i experiment).
Vice: Necessary condition(singing), proud(major), vision, dark secret(venatores)
Can you imagine a singing magi, blue paint on his face and body, destroying, binding and making magic item with the same demon he hunt ? If you know Wraith lore from world of darkness, you should imagin easely the possibility of what a verditius can do with a limitless supply of vis from demon (or sort of), near a sacrificial circle of huge stone.
Another question, how can i make my magi survive ? Creo vim for masking aura on items ? Mentem with huge penetration for rewriting (or forget) what the guernicus had seen with Sense Holyness ?
Did this concept have flaw you can clearly see ?