Notes on Eve's theology: its heterodox as all hell. Shouldn't be surprising though. Here are some key points though:
- The world was created by the impure demiurge, not really evil, but certainly not the Divine. Worthy of neither honor nor worship. The Divine, a.k.a Ennoia would be source of Light and goodness and all that. Why worshipers of the demiurge get Divine auras? Eve doesn't know.
- The world is filled with evil being made by the demiurge. One of the things you can do to rectify this is form good out of it anyway. The demiurge is of course, imperfect and ultimately an emanation of Ennoia, so its more than possible to find good in the world.
2a) This means you should enjoy life. Things that the corrupt Church would call debauchery, gluttony and lust. Still don't over induldge. Destroying your body and succumbing to the temptations of alcoholism or overeating is another failure. Feast, but don't eat yourself to death. Feel the ecstasy provided by exercise. But also do good deeds. And don't hurt other people in your indulgence. Be good to yourself and your neighbor. - The secret knowledge of the Gnostic cult will help you reach "heaven" after death, but so will good deeds. And of course, the desired "heaven" is more of a purification and expansion of your soul and nothing like what the corrupt Church preaches. Their heaven is simply a trick to lure souls away from enlightenment.
- One of the great expansions of the soul is what Eve calls Apotheosis. It isn't the end of the road, but even seeing the next step requires even more enlightenment than one could hope to achieve on the mortal coil.
- This part is more or less purely linguistic and leads to a lot of confusion. Ennoia is not a god. It would be insulting to compare her to a god. "Worship" Ennoia, "revere" gods. This is similar to the Church's distinction between God and Saints, although since Eve won't use the same words... more confusion.
Design notes: This is a combination of stuff pulled from the gnostic, and Philosopher of Rome sections in mystery cults, wikipedia, RoP: the Divine, and the Church book. The main change I intended from the Philo of Rome given orthodoxy is the "reckless pursuit of wine, women (and/or men), and song" is replaced with the "informed, possibly poorly, pursuit of wine, women (and/or men), and song". I also made the assumption that magi are somehow able to believe say: Muslim's infidels and definitely not followers of God while the Church is totally working for God. When evidence would point to both being followers of God.
Thoughts comments suggestions?