I recently posted a huge load of spells on Yair's spell wiki (like 20+), and of all of then only two were called into question. I think that’s a pretty good score myself
So, instead of wasting space there debating about them, I decided to bring my two forlorn questionables here to the Forum for you fine folk to pick apart.
Mail of the Master Smith
CrTe 20 Ritual (Req: An)
R: Touch, D: Momentary, T: Individual
This ritual repairs and improves a suit of metal armour, making it a better quality example of its kind. It is mended & oiled, cleaned of any dirt, rust or tarnish, and has any imperfections or impurities removed. The armour received an improved Protection bonus of +1 for a Partial suit and +2 for a Full suit. The improvement is natural and will fade over time if not maintained. A Variant spell used on a metal shield would grant a +1 Defense bonus.
(B:5 :, R: Touch +1, D: Momentary, T: Individual, Metal +2)
I see your point, but I figure a stronger shield has got to offer more protection than a flimsier one. It's more difficult to split or penetrate (conditions not taken into account for in the standard combat rules). Maybe +1 is more appropriate. (Mark added later) I just reread it, the variant wouldn't make the shield just stronger, it makes it a "better example of it's kind", which can mean many things.
Sword of Damascene Steel
CrTe 20 Ritual
R: Touch, D: Momentary, T: Individual This spell increases the quality of a sword, removing impurities and bringing it closer to it’s ideal true form. It is better balanced and will hold a keener edge, granting a +1 bonus to it’s Attack and Damage scores. As any item the sword needs normal care and maintenance, but the improvement is natural and permanent.
Blacksmith’s with a score of 7 or higher in their craft can forge such a weapon, but only if they have been taught the proper technique of Damascus steel forging. In Iberia this is known as Toledo steel. Such quality weapons cannot be improved again by this spell.
(B:5 :, R: Touch +1, D: Momentary, T: Individual, Metal +2)
I don't have that book, and this spell was invented many years ago. Is my assessment of a Quality weapon in ArM5 accurate?
Any comments, opinions, or advice?