I'm only deleted 31-st year and now not doing anything with any sheet or page.
You are showing Magic Theory with 46 points where I have magic theory with 42 points, and you have 5 points in Intrigue which I do not show you having gotten.
Assuming that removing the last year is the only change you made to your advancement log...
Last year (deleted one) contains 10 exp in Carouse, 5 exp in Bargain, 5 exp in Intrigue, 4 exp in Magic Theory from which, it seems, i forgot to write down 10 exp in Carouse, so there should also be 5 exp in Bargain.
I did nothing with main page of character (where sheet is), because more edits provides more opportunities to fail somehow.
That would be the year you removed? I was more interested in having your current character sheet reflect the point we are at...
I did check it all and, i suppose, it does.
You have carouse at 20 where it should be at 15.
Fixed.
okay, now lets discuss this lab- where did it come from? There seems to me to be a lot of assumptions here bridging the gap between "possible" and "readily available"
I believe, that just as Vis, some amount of Mythic Pounds are available each year. In other case, other magi's labs would be totally unmanageable. While precise available amount is unknown to me, i'm inclined to believe that if Schwartz has a lab with total upkeep of +1, then Wifait could easily has a lab with total upkeep of -1.
So, he procured a wooden wagon (which, i guess, isn't a big deal) and a laboratory equipment - something, that any magus did at one point or another. Then he constructed a lab inside the wagon - without lot of equipment and any decorations.
constructing a lab requires two seasons.
And only the first one is crucial: second one merely removes "Basic" Laboratory Flaw. Per Covenants, p.106.
And as Wifait has more than enough to do what he needs to do in this lab even with -3 General Quality from it being Basic, he could live with this flaw for quite a while.
okay. Given the amount this character is shooting themselves in the foot due to impatience it seems they should have had a major flaw of driven. However that is fine- keep in mind that over time she will start to develop a negative reputation from the negative aesthetics score.
Time to go for the second decade?
yes
I rolled a Side Effect on an Experimentation table and it says "The spell has a major side effect. For example, a plant control spell attracts all birds in 100 paces." and "Side Effect: Your magical creation acquires a side effect. Roll a simple die, and work out the specifics with the storyguide.", so.
Context of experimentation in question is in the latest season.
Sure, i have some idea, but i'd prefer to sign it with you right away if it's fine or find out another one if it's not.
I have something I have to handle- if you read this before I get back to this- which year is the issue in?
It has a big mark, so you won't miss it.
Okay, I hadn't been reading the narratives, there are some issues here, like the fact that the Gift is not generally passed through family lines, you are bringing in characters- the descriptions are vague but this really needed discussion before it got to this point...
I'm totally sure, i generally can bring in characters to make them into grogs/companions later (when my magus will be finished, at least). If this will happen, i'm sure, we will discuss them. If not, then they won't play any role and, hence, discussion is not necessary?
Yes, it generally is not. Is this a reason for a character, who think of himself and his line as of being predisposed to the Gift, to try and check his progeny? And, most importantly, find them Giftless. It's not that i'm gonna just make an apprentice out of thin air. In fact, his line not being magical will serve as a hook for him to go and check out this new covenant to get an apprentice of his line there.
I misread that, I thought you were saying he is Gifted. However there are still issues, partly in that the narrative frequently clashes with your supposed activity- you describe a season of adventure as spending time with your family in multiple instances, you are referring to your wife as a "Ripper", though I have no idea what you are referring to, and you call your son scaly when he is born- all elements that make assumptions about what is possible for the character's background or what exist in this world without bothering to ask.