So, no using Pilum of Fire on demons? No Incantation of Lightning?
Also, why? Is there an argument for this, other than 'I want demons to be a real threat to magi!'?
Yes, it's called The Limit of the Infernal. Any spell that only reacts to a demon effectively detects that something is a demon, which is explicitly something hermetic magic is bad at.
And I didn't say demons should be immune to magic. Go ahead, and pilum of fire them all you want. I just disagrees with "Pilum of Fire that only burns a demon".
My apologies, I misread your comment.
1 Like
Bugman’s mug:effect:you cure drunkenness!
Duration: instant
Target: individual
Range:touch
Regocorpus 10?
Focus:a drinking horn?(+3?)
If it is healing a disease-like effect, it is Creo Corpus. Based on the guideline, healing the debilitating effect of a poison (alcohol is a king of poison), the base is 20.
So Creo Corpus "Peaceful Next Morning", R: Touch (+1), Base 20, so 25.
It is a bit steep for an handover cure, you might consider that as healing a minor wound, that would decrease the base to 15 for a final 20.
Thanks!
I suspect spending vis on curing hangover will be severly frowned upon or even mocked in even the most vis-rich covenant, and that even if vis wasn't a concern, spending 75m on a ritual to cure hangover will not seem like a good idea. Make sure to add in a sun duration.
Aniperson:effect:any animal that you become is human like in form(think teenage mutant ninja turtles for inspiration of this spell in our world)
Mutocorpus (animal)30
Range:personal
Duration:sun
Target:self
Interesting spell huh?
If it changes an animal into a human(-oid) shape, it would be MuAn(Co), not MuCo(An). Not that it makes much difference.
Ok, just a thought. It was designed for the house of wizards that can change into animals naturally.
Sleigh f&m bonus:+3 to movement
+2 to carry capacity?