Any Errors in Definitive Edition?

Games Discussion Ars Magica
1

Have you found any errors in Definitive Edition? If so, please report them using this form:

There are very few reports of errors here. It is, I think, actually possible that this is because the current draft of ArMD is exceptionally clean, and contains almost no errors. (It is derived from texts that the community has been working with for decades, we had months of discussion here, and then @callen and I went through it all again. We could, conceivably, have caught almost everything.) However, I do not believe that.

This is the last chance, because layout is finishing up, and then we will make the final corrections before sending the book to print.

Thank you!

3 Likes
Help in the lab question
2

It is an ancient tenant of my faith that the Definitive Edition is inerrant and any seeming errors are mortal limitations of understanding.

10 Likes
3

I know… way too late but p.366. InVi Guidelines, we seem to be missing the Base 10

W

4

Not an error. We now have much more detailed rules, in terms of negative magnitudes, for what that guideline covered.

2 Likes
5

On that note, do we have an errata reporting function somewhere? I have found a few from the Markdown project (the relevant ones are listed in the DE markdown file)

6

Errata are no longer being collected.

7

I’m collecting errata here: Errata - Project: Redcap

3 Likes