Re: Casting Tools
I believe that the idea here is one casting tool per formulaic spell. Is that the accept canon? HoH: MC seems to imply the notion in several places (enchanting tools, casting spont with tools, flaw, etc.)
Justy trying to confirm the current canon on how casting tools work.
That’s usually how its interpreted, yes.
it should be 1233.
I just posted - not sure that Tastheus knows which rooms other are in at the moment.
Assume Argentius's comments come after the arrival of the other magi. No intention to rush ahead or skip them.
I assume Plasmatoris followed the others to the meeting hall. Hopefully we didnt leave him doddling in the library.
I suppose now might be a good oppertunity for having him say it?
I'll be following, had a busy afternoon getting stabbed in the arm by health professionals.
at least it was health professionals, being stabbed in the arm by criminal amateurs is much less pleasant, from what I understand.
As someone who has played a variety of RPG games, getting stabbed in the arm is time for healing potions.
Am I the only one who invested in Magic Theory? 
Heh. It seems to me Argentius comes next, but Aetherius is the only one that can do it by himself. With the others, it always has to be two magi, which tends to go over 10 with any combination. Happily, Lares has leadership 2.
Though you don't really know that IC, so probably just go with two.
Zarkut has a 9, not terrible...
Problem with Argentius is major pride and hubris but its a possibility.
Slightly annoying that there is like three conversations happening at the same time. But i suppose its a limitation of the format you can do nothing about.
Another format limitation was getting me out of my labs because planning a meeting in the evening works better in a real time game than it does when you need 5 posts to cover a half an hour period. shrug
I'll say this here. It starts a game badly to say "we must do XYZ or else I will leave the covenant". I for one hope we can all get along, and the last thing I want is to push anyone off the covenant over a decision, but the standard operating principle of a normal covenant is relatively democratic decision-making between equals. I'm not a fan of ultimatums, unless there's a reasonable injustice being discussed, like bulldozing someone's lab.
Am aware, but OOC, this is an attempt by her to force the covenant to make the decision she thinks is best for all involved. She wouldn't really leave.
Argentius invested some in MT.
As to the hubris and pride... I'm making the assumption that this is Argentius as newly gauntleted, not Argentius at 133 years old. That arrogance, hubris, and pride could be significant drivers to his wanting to make sure this covenant he helped found doesn't end in disaster... or that its current vulnerability spills out into a vendetta that could be 100+ years old...
In other words, I suspect he could swallow his pride to safeguard loftier goals.
How very Tytalus of you 
You should be disappointed the other Tytalus isn't acting the same... 