... I really wish the author pool would have worked together to eliminate such overlaps. Having just a single name for a specific spell (and a single "spell" for a specific name) just makes things so much easier.
They did. There was a lot of discussion to make sure that everyone was doing things the same way. There were even discussions of spell naming conventions, and the desirability of one standard name if all the parameters were the same. In a 150,000 word book, however, some things get missed.
"No penalty once bound". We had a substantial discussion over the best way to do this, and that's the conclusion we came to. You can't back-hack, though, as I don't think the date of binding and seasons of teaching received are recorded for all the familiars. Word count limits.
Really? Does it say that about the Aegis penetration explicitly? If so, I need this in the other thread. This would be relatively huge as Life Boost applies to Formulaic spells, only applying to Ritual spells if they are Formulaic.
Sure, an Aegis at a mere level of 20, cast without assistance for a poor Penetration is not very useful. But then again, such can the situation for a failing Winter covenant sometimes be. Luckily there is a new generation to take over, in the rebirth of Second Spring.
And then I guess the young magi at Collem Leonis had better get their act together and invent Day of Communion from the convienently supplied text.
And in time perhaps one of them should bother to invent the Aegis as well, since Ferra may not be there forever, nor be reliable as caster, given her situation.
I gave Jardin a thorough reading today and really enjoyed it.
Great idea for a covenant with a unique mystical feature that could easily draw player characters to the covenant from other covenants already in play. And there's easily enough going on to start a new saga there. Nice job, CJ.