Mythic Judaism

The goal of this thread is to give troupes tools to include some aspects of Judaism in their campaigns. I want to represent the wide diversity of the Jewish world in 1220, so this will not just be a thread with some famous rabbis, though of course there will be some of those!

Our modern sources are naturally biased towards rabbis, who are exclusively male and in a privileged position in the community. I’m going to be more inventive to cover places where we don’t have good sources, but you may be surprised at some material that does come down to us that’s outside the usual stereotype of a medieval rabbi.

Jews can be found in most Tribunals in 1220. Hibernia and Loch Leglean are probably the only tribunals entirely devoid of Jews. In Stonehenge, Novgorod, Thebes, Transylvania, and the Greater Alps they are less common but still present. The Roman Tribunal has a strong and ancient community that has some unique practices compared to the rest of the Jewish world. The Iberian, Provencal, Normandy, Rhine, and Levant Tribunals are the centers of the Jewish world and (with Egypt) where most of our surviving sources from the period were written.

I will try to define strange terms as I go, but there are some things that will appear across many posts, so I’ll flesh them out here in the introduction. I also encourage you to review the (mostly) excellent chapter on Mythic Judaism in Realms of Power: The Divine (ROPD)

The Torah can refer to the five books of Moses (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, and Deuteronomy), to the entire Hebrew Bible, or to Jewish teaching in general. The Written Torah is a more specific way of referring to the Hebrew Bible. The Oral Torah is the collection of initially unwritten laws that were additionally given to Moses at Sinai and have been transmitted through rabbinic tradition.

The Talmud is one of two collections of books that contains halakhic discussions, rabbinic stories, and associated maters. The Jerusalem Talmud is the more ancient of the two. The Babylonian Talmud was codified slightly later and is the more commonly studied collection. The Talmud is the central text of the Oral Torah.

Halakah is Jewish law. It has its basis in the Torah, the Talmud, and in responsa by rabbis. It governs not just religious life but also dietary laws, interpersonal relations, and matters of ethics.

Ashkenazi Jews are the Jews of France and Germany. Sephardic Jews are the Jews of Spain and Portugal. Mizrahi Jews are the Jews of the Middle East and North Africa. Each of these traditions has their own history and tradition, but they also intermingle, especially between scholars.

A pogram is a massacre or persecution of a Jewish minority by the religious majority. Pograms by Christians are an unfortunately common threat to Jews in Mythic Europe.

A responsa is a rabbinic answer to a halakic question. It describes how the rabbi thinks an issue should be decided, and gives the basis for the rabbi’s position.

I use the Ars Magica book abbreviations provided by Project Redcap. List of products by edition - Project: Redcap

Let me know if any of this makes it into an Ars Magica saga!

7 Likes

Including Judaism in Your Saga
Running Sagas with No Jewish Companions or Magi
Running Sagas with One Jewish Companion or Magus
Running an All Jewish Saga

Characters
Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel Quests for Rain
Hannah bat Yitzchaki, Agunah
Josef ben Yitzhak, Bored City Guard
Menachem ben Qalonymus
Moses ben Nachman
Leah bat Yitzak, Defiant Baal Teshuva (Character Sheets)

Virtues and Flaws
Yetzer Hara and Yetzer HaTov
The Shabbat Queen and Her Angels
The Love Magic of Yehudah bar Yoshiyah
Halakhic Day
The Call to Be Jewish

Vis Sources
Crossdressing Brides and Grooms
Drunk as a Rabbi on Purim

Books
The Talmud
Must a Jew Abstain from Hermetic Magic? Part 1 Part 2 Part 3
The Controversial Maimonides

Antagonists
Blood Libel Mazzikin
Captured by the Bird Headed Jews
Geniza Desecration

Miracles
Miraculous Kol Nidre
Ne'ilah and the Closing of the Gates
The Cave of Honi the Circle Maker

Locations
Jewish Troyes
Jews of the Provance Tribunal

1 Like

Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel Quests for Rain

Plausible - This post is about a real person from historical Europe who lived 100 years later than 1220. You could have his story occur early and still have a very plausible historical game.

Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel, also known as The Rosh, was a halakhic innovator who was born in Germany and traveled through the Jewish world to Spain in 1303. He wrote about his journey, and his somewhat revolutionary halachic opinions in 1313, which is how we know his story.

For some background, there are several prayers for rain in the Jewish liturgy. One prays for rain in Israel and is tied to that agricultural cycle. The other, tal u-matar, is Rabbi Asher’s concern. It is based on the Babylonian agricultural year and happens at slightly different times than the Israeli prayer for rain. The haladakh around this prayer is found in the Babylonian Talmud. Rabbi Asher’s innovation (which is supported by various Talmudic sources and has been a suggested in modern times as well) is to change the days when the prayer for rain is said to correspond with the local needs for rain and the local agricultural calendar. Normally the tal u-matar prayer is said from November 22nd to the start of Passover. Rabbi Asher supports saying it when prayer is normally needed, potentially up to a month early and two months late.

When studying in his native Germany, Rabbi Asher had held that rain was necessary from the middle of Tishrei to Shavout (roughly September to June) and that it was especially needed in the early fall - before usual time when the tal u-matar prayer is said - to protect the newly sown seeds from being eaten by rats and chickens. Rabbi Asher, therefore, urged his fellow German Jews to pray for rain between the seventh of Marsheshvan and Shavout by inserting the words tal u-matar in the Blessing of the Years at that time.

None of Rabbi Asher’s fellow German Jews disputed his reasoning, since they recognized the logic of his position. Nevertheless, they refused to listen to his recommendations that they change their custom.

Later, as he passed through Provence on his way from Germany to Spain (in 1303 CE) Rabbi Asher faced a somewhat different situation. There he was pleased to learn that the Jews in Montpellier began saying tal u-matar earlier than the traditional practice. When he was told, however, that they stopped saying it at Passover, he asked whether this was because they had no need for rain after that time. They answered that, indeed, they did need rain, Rabbi Asher repeated to them the position he had taken with the German Jews, i.e. that the Jews of each country should ask for rain when they need it. The Provencal reaction was similar to the German reaction, namely that Rabbi Asher's logic was sound, but custom is custom.

When he reached Spain, Rabbi Asher saw that the need for rain there was even greater than in Germany or Provence. Though he mentioned to his colleagues several times that they ought to ask for rain between Passover and Shavout, he did not make a public issue of it at the time so as to not change the local custom.

This brings us to the year 1313, when he wrote his responsum on the subject. Because of a great drought, Spanish Jews were fasting for rain and saying special prayers on Sabbaths and holidays. Now, he thought, was a propitious time to bring about the change he wanted. If he could convince Spanish Jews to say tal u-matar this year until Shavout, he felt, they would find the practice agreeable and continue it in following years. So, once again, Rabbi Asher tried to convince a group of Jews to follow the logic of the situation rather than the custom. Once again, he failed.

In Rabbi Asher’s own words, "The heart of the community was unwilling to accept the words of the living God."

Rabbi Asher’s story has several lessons. First, we see the importance of tradition in Jewish life. The Rabbi ultimately failed to change any practice, even under the most favorable circumstances. Second, we see the diversity of the Jewish world - as he moves through Provance he encounters a practice for the prayer for rain that does not match Germany or Spain (or our own modern practice). Judaism was a diverse tradition with a common core. Third, we see a rabbi who does not quite fit the mold of the pious scholar. In reading Rabbi Asher’s account it's easy to imagine him haranguing a crowd in a fiery sermon on Shabbat morning.

Rabbi Asher ben Jehiel
Age 53
Virtues: Educated (Hebrew), Rabbi, Well Traveled
Flaws: Outsider (Minor), Driven (Major), Proud (Minor)
Personality Traits: Driven to change other people’s habits +3, Proud of his halakhic skill +2, Willing to start and argument +2, Logical +2, Abrasive +1, Pious +0

Story Seed - Rabbi Asher and the Drought
The fall rains do not come to the covenant and surrounding lands. Rumors do come to the covenant of an itinerant rabbi who has arrived in a nearby town with a strong Jewish community, claiming that he can solve the problem. When the magi meet with him they discover that Rabbi Asher is committed to practical logic, outspoken, driven to change the communal practice, and a bit prideful. He asks for their help in convincing the populace to pray for rain outside the appointed time. If the magi solve the drought through magic Rabbi Asher will be devastated that he has lost an opportunity to change the community’s practice and will condemn them publicly as wizards. If they magically change the minds of the populace he may accept this intervention, but what if other Jewish authorities find out? If the covenant takes no action, will the Chrisitan authorities intervene against this Jew stirring up trouble in the community? And if Rabbi Asher gets his way and the community does offer prayer for rain early, before November 22nd, will the skies open up or will Rabbi Asher be rejected by the heavens?

2 Likes

I'm so pleased you are doing this in the Venice book the ghetto was something I knew I didn't have the skills to do.

1 Like

Crossdressing Brides and Grooms

Mythic Historical - this post describes a real thing that happened in Egypt, but gives it a Mythic spin to make it more interesting in a saga. What we know of this practice is from a short responsa from the Cairo Geniza written in around 1200 and translated in Noam Sienna’s excellent book A Rainbow Thread.

A tradition among the Mizrahi Jews of Egypt is to celebrate a wedding by cross dressing. The bride and her friends dress up in the style of the local non-Jewish Arab men. This includes a turban and a sword. They ladies dance around the synagogue waving their swords around and singing. At the same time the groom is made up with cosmetics like eyeliner, lipstick, and blush.

The party happens in the synagogue after religious wedding itself. This joyous event fulfills the mitzvah of celebrating with the bride and groom. The affair can get out of hand, of course, with some brides coming home with a few bumps and bruises from mock sword fights, but it’s all in good fun.

The Sephardi Jews of Egypt strongly disapprove of this custom, which violates their understanding of the Torah prohibitions against cross dressing. Rabbi Avraham ben HaRambam, the son of Maimonides and most prominent of the Sephardi rabbis of Egypt wrote a disapproving responsa, “this is a crooked path and the path of sinners, that they do this in public, in the synagogues, in the midst of the congregation and community of Israel, on holidays, and no one takes any heed.”

The Sephardi rabbis have had no luck stopping this popular practice, which is perfectly acceptable in the eyes of Mizrahi rabbis.

This delightful celebration is of interest to magi as well, since the gender play can cause the creation of Muto Vis. A wedding celebrated on the auspicious day of Tu B'Av (in August) will generate the vis. It is gathered by collecting the turban worn by the bride and soaking it in the water the groom uses to wash off his makeup. This can be a vis source for a covenant in the Levant Tribunal, or anywhere that this custom may have spread. (See COV5 page 72 for recommendation on how much vis this source might give in your saga).

Story Seed - Securing the Vis
The covenant discovers the source of vis by happenstance, perhaps a grog with Magic Sensitivity. They then must figure out how to actually collect the vis. Will they gain the trust of the Jewish community and simply ask for their discarded party clothes? Or will they try to steal from the Jews, risking upsetting them?

Story Seed - Rabbinic Party Pooping
A Sephardic rabbi writes a fiery responsa on this practice, citing the Torah “A woman must not put on man’s apparel, nor shall a man wear woman’s clothing” He is influential enough that some of the Mizrahi rabbis even support him, and may put an end to the practice, destroying the vis source. Can the covenant defend the practice? If their meddling is discovered will that only strengthen the side of the Sephardim?

Story Seed - The No Fun Emir
The local Emir finds out about this practice and decides that the brides are mocking him. Perhaps he’s got a point, but his anger threatens to end the practice and destroy the vis source. Worse, if it becomes common knowledge that Jews are mocking their Arab neighbors it might result in a pogram. Can he be placated or deceived?

2 Likes

The Talmud

Historical - this post describes the Talmud as it was historically and describes it mechanically for Ars Magica.

The Talmud is a central text of Rabbinic Judaism and the primary source of halakha and rabbinic thought.

The term refers to one of two collections of writings. By default it refers to the Babylonian Talmud compiled around the year 500. There is also an earlier collection known as the Jerusalem Talmud, which overlaps with the Bavli in places but also contains novel material.

The Talmud has two components: the Mishnah, a written compendium of the Oral Torah; and the Gemara, an elucidation of the Mishnah and related Tannaitic writings that often ventures onto other subjects and expounds broadly on the Hebrew Bible. Not every part of the Mischa has Gemara, and these parts are not included in the Talmud. Modern Talmud editions also include later rabbinic commentaries, but many of those do not exist in 1220 and those that do are not included with the text in the standardized way that the printing press has allowed.

The entire Talmud consists of 63 tractates. It contains the teachings and opinions of hundreds of rabbis on a variety of subjects, including halakha, Jewish ethics, philosophy, customs, history, and folklore, and many other topics. The Talmud is the basis for all codes of Jewish law and is widely quoted in rabbinic literature. Because it is written in both Mishnaic Hebrew and Jewish Babylonian Aramaic a student of the Talmud must have a Dead Language score of 4 in both Hebrew and Aramaic.

ROPD described the Talmud mechanically in a way that does not match up well with the text. Its description better matches studying the Mishnah alone. I recommend considering ROPD’s version of the “Talmud” to actually be the Mischna, and to use the Talmud I describe below in your campaign. ROPD’s Mischna is 18 tractati in total, six each in Theology: Judaism, Rabbinical Law, and Judaic Lore. Each has a Quality of 8.

The updated Talmud is three Summae in the same collection. The Talmud is very large; it costs 6 Mythic Pounds, twice the standard rate. If purchased as a covenant resource it costs the standard amount of build points. The three Summae are Theology: Judaism Level 9 Quality 4, Rabbinical Law Level 9 Quality 4, Judaic Lore Level 9 Quality 4. In this way the Talmud can be studied for a lifetime, as it was historically, but it's not a particularly useful source without its commentaries.

The core commentaries on the Talmud that exist in 1220 are Rashi and the Tosafot. Rashi was the first commentator to extensively annotate the Talmud. He wrote his commentaries in the 11th century. He focuses on defining difficult to understand words and explaining difficult phrasings, explaining the peshat, the plain meaning of the text.

The Tosafot are a school of scholars in Northern France and Germany descended from Rashi. They are currently working in 1220, and have been for one hundred years. Each Tosafist.has his own style and insight, but in general they go beyond the plain meaning, expanding a single passage with reference to entirely different parts of the Talmud, into allegorical theology, or into matters of halakah which may seem unrelated. The work of the Tosafists is ongoing and there is no single definitive.text, only a collection of Tosafists.commentaries that are copied and passed among the schools of Mythic Europe. The commentaries collectively are also referred to as Tosafot.

Rashi’s commentary on the Talmud can often be found physically on the text itself and is considered a gloss (COV5 page 91). A Talmud with this text costs an additional mythic pound. Rashi’s commentary increases the Quality of each Summa by 2 to 6.

The only compiled Tosafot commentary in 1220 is the Tosafot of Sens, which has only recently been codified by its author Rabbi Samson sen Abraham of Sens. Mechanically it is a commentary on Talmud that can only be read if you have already studied a copy of the Talmud with Rashi’s commentary. There are three Tractates, each with Quality 9. See COV5 page 90 for the rules on commentaries.

The active work of the Tosafists is represented by any number of compilations of correspondences. These may be actual letters between Jewish communities, compiled into a bound correspondence with Quality 4 dealing with a variety of Abilities. Someone who is already a skilled scholar of Jewish topics may be able to initiate a correspondence with a Tosafist, and thereby gain an experience point a season (See COV5 page 90) It must be left to later authors to codify and redact this work into a more useful set of Tosafot such as we have today.

Far more common than any written product of the Tosafists is their work in the beit midrash, the house of study. Any character who is recognized as Jewish by the community (and likely has the Outsider flaw for the rest of Mythic Europe) can study at a beit midrash of one of the Tosafist schools. There are schools in many towns of the Normandy Tribunal, most notably Sens, Evreux, Touques, and Paris. A student needs a score of 4 in Aramaic and Hebrew, and a score of 1 in Artes Liberales to be able to participate in a beit midrash. Students without those skills will be taught them. Characters spend two seasons a year at the beit midrash, and two seasons working to support themselves, modified as usual for being Poor or Wealthy. The beit midrash uses the Teaching rules (ARM5 page 164) and a typical teacher will have Communication 1 and Teaching 5 so students will gain 9 experience a season.

A beit midrash will take a student of any age, but for a typical Jewish child Torah study, which is really study in ancient languages, begins at age 5. Mishna study begins at age 10, followed by Talmud study at age 15. This corresponds with the Mischna’s guidelines:

At five years of age the study of Scripture;
At ten the study of Mishnah;
At thirteen subject to the commandments;
At fifteen the study of Talmud;
At eighteen the bridal canopy;
At twenty for pursuit [of livelihood];
At thirty the peak of strength;
At forty wisdom;
At fifty able to give counsel;
At sixty old age;
At seventy fullness of years;
At eighty the age of “strength”;
At ninety a bent body;
At one hundred, as good as dead and gone completely out of the world.

Story Seed - Wayward Commentary
A disheveled Redcap arrives at the covenant in a rush. Maria is the sort of Redcap who is always running a few days late, but this time it’s worse than normal. She quickly drops off the covenant’s correspondence, and explains she needs to run because she has a pressing letter that must reach a powerful covenant in the Tribunal. She asks a favor of the covenant - she is carrying a package to a certain Simon in a nearby town. Would the covenant mind completing the delivery? It turns out Simon is a local Rabbi, and the package contains correspondence from the noted Tosafist Samson ben Abraham of Sens. How is Rabbi Simon going to react when a wizard shows up at his doorstep? And why is a Redcap carrying Jewish mail?

4 Likes

Hannah bat Yitzchaki, Agunah

Plausible - this post is about a fictional character who fits well into a historical context. Hannah is a very stereotypical pious rabbi character, but of course she’s a woman. In the French / German community she comes from scholarly women are surprisingly accepted, and we know that they performed many classically male religious and societal roles. But Hannah has a uniquely female problem - she is a widow who can’t remarry.

The daughters of the great scholar Rashi, Yoheved, Miriam, and Rachel, were each learned Torah scholars in their own right. Legend has is that that they wore tefillin - ritual objects worn during the daily prayers and conventionally worn only by men. Rashi had no male children, so these women, the men the married, and the children and grand-children they had were the inheritors of his legacy. The tradition of female scholarship was accepted in their French and German community and continued in many of their descendants, including the (fictional) scholar Hannah bat Yitzchaki.

Hannah is the great-great-grandchild of Rashi, and not from a particularly notable part of his lineage. As such she married a diligent if uninspiring scholar named Judah shortly after she turned 18. The pair quickly realized that Hannah was the superior Torah scholar by far, having inherited the gift of the descendants of Rashi. Judah bore her no ill will - in fact he delighted in coming home to share the Torah he had learned at the beit midrash (school) with her each day. They would stay up late at night to discuss a particularly interesting point of halacha.

The pair had three children, Isaac, Joseph, and Rachel. Hannah busied herself during the day caring for the children, but also, as they grew up, she devoted herself to the delicate needlework needed to create parchment fine enough to create a Torah scroll. Once the parchment was completed she carefully copied the text - letter by letter - from a completed Torah scroll. “It is a tree of life for those who hold fast to it,” she reminded herself.

The crusaders came at night. The family woke to hear shouts, screams, and the roar of flames. There were armed Christians in the streets, but they could only hide for so long before the blaze reached their house. The family rushed outside, into the chaos, but then Hannah stopped. The Torah scrolls were inside, and the house was on fire. She and Judah shared a look. He took the children by the hand and fled into the night. Hannah raced into the burning building. She emerged, burned and gasping for air, holding fast to both the completed Torah and the work in progress.

She never saw Judah and the children again. They must have fallen to the Christians’s swords.

Hannah left behind her slaughtered community and murdered family, the Torah scrolls her only reminder of what she has lost.

It has been four years since that dreadful day. The grief has not left, but it has lessened. She has said kaddish, the mourning prayer, for her husband and her children. Perhaps she is ready to move on.

Unfortunately for her, Hannah is an agunah, a chained woman. This can happen to a married woman because her husband refuses to grant her a divorce, or (as in Hannah’s case) because her husband has disappeared. Even though there is every reason to believe he is dead, halakah forbids her to remarry until he is officially declared dead by a beit din, a Jewish legal court consisting of three observant men (typically three rabbis). Until Jacob is officially dead Hannah is in a kind of legal limbo and can’t fully reintegrate into Jewish society.

The concern is that, were Hannah to remarry, any children she had with her new husband would be mamzers if Jacob were to reappear. A mamzer is a kind of bastard who cannot get married except to other mamzers. This status is unchangeable and transmits to the mamzer’s children. As such the rabibs work hard to prevent the creation of mamzers by forbidding remarriage when it is not perfectly clear that the previous marriage is over, by death or divorce.

The local beit din, lead by Rabbi Moses ben Eleazar, has heard Hannah’s testimony and has every reason to believe her. And there is room to rule that Jacob is dead in Jewish law, the Talmud relates that “If a person fell into a pit filled with snakes and scorpions, one may [declare him dead], since it is certain that they killed him.” A town full of Crusaders can be seen as very similar to a pit of scorpions.

However, when the beit din was hearing testimony a certain baker named Ezra ben Simon testified that he saw Judah escape from the town. The truth is that Ezra is a transplant from Provance, where learned women are not accepted in society. He sees Hannah as an uppity woman who deserves to be punished for having the temerity to write Torah scrolls. The baker’s testimony is not definitive, but it has cast enough doubt on the matter that the beit din will not rule that Jacob is dead.

The definitive proof would be if the beit din heard testimony from two Jewish men who could independently testify that Jacob had died. But no one saw him die. Hannah is, of course, a respected member of the community, a skilled Torah scholar, and the great-great-granddaughter of Rashi, of blessed memory. But as a woman her voice does not hold the same weight as the baker from the south.

The stage is set for the covenant to get involved and free the chained woman.

Hannah bat Yitzchaki
Characteristics: Int +3, Per -2, Pre 0, Com +2, Str -1, Sta -1, Dex +3, Qik 0
Size: 0
Age: 27 (27)
Decrepitude: 0 (0)
Warping Score: 0 (0)
Confidence Score: 1 (3)
Virtues and Flaws
Free: Craftswoman
Virtues: Educated (Hebrew) x 2, Clear Thinker, Good Teacher, Apt Student. Affinity for Craft: Scroll Making, Affinity for Profession: Scribe, Improved Characteristics
Flaws: Outsider (Major), Close Family Ties (Rashi’s Family), Fear (Knights), Pious (Major)
Personality Traits: Brave +3, Confident Scholar +3, Faithfully Jewish +5, Ready to remarry +2, Suspicious of magi +1
Reputations: None.
Combat:
Dodging: Init -1, Atk n/a, Def -1, Dam n/a
Soak: -1 (Stamina)
Fatigue Levels: OK, 0, –1, –3, –5, Unconscious
Wound Penalties: –1 (1–5), –3 (6–10), –5 (11–15), Incapacitated (16–20)
Abilities: Aramaic 4 (talmud), Artes Liberales 3 (writing), Awareness 2 (Christians), Bargain 1 (Book making supplies), Charm 2 (Rabbis), Concentration 3 (writing), Craft: Scroll Making 7 (Torahs), Dominion Lore 1 (synagogue miracles), Folk Ken 2 (children), Guile 1 (lying to Christians), Hebrew 5 (writing), Infernal Lore 1 (jewish demons), Leadership 3 (children), Language: Yiddish 5 (singing), Music 2 (singing), Profession: Scribe 7 (Hebrew), Stealth 2 (escaping), Survival 2 (foraging), Rabbinic Law 4 (text care and creation), Teaching 4 (Talmud), Theology: Judaism 3 (why Hashem allows bad things to happen), Worms Area Lore 3 (Jewish Community)
Equipment: Parchment, quill, ink, torah scroll.
Encumbrance: 0 (0)
Customization Notes: Hannah can take another two points of Virtues and Flaws. The Relic virtue could be used to make her rescued Torah scrolls a symbol of Divine power. Her Yiddish language is appropriate for a covenant in the Rhine. If the covenant is in Normandy or Provance she would speak Zarphatic (a Hebrew / French language). Magi are unlikely to speak either language, but a German or French speaker can communicate with a speaker of the corresponding Jewish language at -2. Hannah’s background is very specific to the French and German Jewish setting; she really only works in the Norman or Rhinish Tribunals.

Rules Note - Craft: Scroll Making
Mundane, Religious, and Hermetic texts of Mythic Europe are generally codexes - bound books created using Craft: Book Binding. Scrolls are a more ancient technology and are the only way to create a kosher Torah. Scrolls can be more difficult to work with than books as it simply takes more time to roll to the right “page” than it does to flip to it. When studying a book the student wastes 5 days a season rolling. In practice this should rarely mean that they lose a full month to distraction and will not lose any advancement XP (see ARM5 page 165). If needing to find information in a scroll quickly add +6 to the ease factor for any roll.

Story Seed - Hannah the Agunah
Hannah wants to return to normal Jewish life and lose her status as an agunah. Having exhausted all normal avenues to prove Jacob is dead, she comes to the covenant, having heard rumors about the strange magical abilities these wizards possess. Sorcery is forbidden for Jews, she reasons, but these goyim are not subject to Jewish law. The magi may be motivated to help a down on her luck woman, but helping her offers practical benefits as well. By helping her the magi will win the favor of the Jewish community. As well, the magi may identify that Hannah is a skilled scribe who could be an asset to the covenant (see below). Summoning a ghost is something the magi can probably do, but is that the sort of proof that a rabbinic court would accept? Perhaps the magi need to magically track down the Jewish survivors of the pogrom and bring them to the beit din (Jewish legal court)? Or can the magi figure out that the baker is lying? Maybe there are other creative ways to solve the problem?

Story Seed - The Skilled Scribe
Hannah is obviously a woman with uncommon scribal skill. The magi may recognize that she is an asset to the covenant, and try to convince her to join. Alternatively, this may be a story for companions and grogs, centered on the covenant seneschal and other crafts people and administrators. Hannah will take some convincing - she does not see what the magi do as inherently evil (so long as they are following the Noahide Laws of not murdering others and the like). But their activities are deeply not Jewish at first glance. If these issues can be smoothed over Hannah has the potential to be of great assistance to the covenant. She is a skilled scribe, and scrolls she produces offer a resonance bonus for Jewish topics or matters of logic and philosophy and even the art of Intellego. (See Cov5). She will need to learn Latin 3 and Magic Theory 1 to allow her to copy Hermetic books. Will she see that the covenant is dedicated to learning, not so differently than the beit midrash? Will she see that the covenant has great difficulties with the Christian authorities, and might be a useful ally for her Jewish community? And if she does join up, how will the two cultures clash?

3 Likes

Blood Libel Mazzikin

Mythicly Plausible - this post is about a historical occurrence, but involves fantastical elements - demons.

Content warning - This post deals with the blood libel, an antisemitic trope that has harmed Jewish people for hundreds of years, even up to the current day. Antisemitism may be an issue that is personally felt for some members of your troupe. Make sure that people are ready to deal with potentially serious topics before introducing this to your saga. If you choose to incorporate this difficult topic into your saga be careful to not allow medieval Christians to escape responsibility for these crimes. Demons are used to place this story in Mythic Europe, but they are not mind controlling the Christians or forcing them to murder Jews. The Christians are doing that all on their own.

A blood libel is the accusation that Jewish people are murdering Christians as part of their religious ceremonies. Period blood libels accuse Jews of torturing children in the same manner that Jesus was tortured, with thorns, whips, and ultimately killing them by crucifixion. In some versions of the story the Jews drink the child’s blood.

Medieval blood libels began in the Stonehenge Tribunal in 1144. They spread to the Normandy Tribunal in 1171, and in 1220 would have been happening every few years in those two Tribunals as well as the Rhine Tribunal.

A blood libel typically followed the following pattern - a child disappears or was found murdered around the time of Easter. This leads the Christian population to accuse the local Jews of being responsible. From there things may proceed in two different ways.

Sometimes the Jews put on trial, typically a group of a dozen adult men. The men are tortured to generate confessions and then executed by burning. Some of the accused, or even the whole Jewish community, may be ransomed. Other Jewish communities gather money to pay the ransom and save the lives of some of the accused.

Sometimes the mob simply takes matters into their own hands. The Christians riot, attacking the Jewish community, murdering its members in the street or trapping them in buildings and burning them alive. Opportunistic Christians steal valuables from Jews after they have been murdered. These pogroms typically kill two dozen Jews, but some accounts describe one hundred and fifty Jews being murdered by the mob.

Mazzikin are the demons who accidentally started this movement, though it is the Christians alone who commit these crimes against the Jewish community. Mazzikin are invisible demons that can create greater or lesser dangers to humans. This Aramaic term, found in the Talmud, means "those who harm". Learned Jews can create amulets and hamsa that ward off the demons.

A certain clutch of Mazzikin started the blood libel craze of the 12th and 13th century. One day in early 1144 in Norwich England a Mazzikin killed a young boy, William, desecrating his body in a mockery of the crucifixion to needle the Christians of the town before they celebrated Easter. This base act of violence succeeded beyond the creature’s wildest dreams. The Christians of Norwich discovered the unfortunate William and were quick to point fingers at the local Jewish community. The accused Jews were placed under the protection of the local sheriff, and ultimately escaped harm.

But the Mazzikin of Norwich saw how a little bit of violence could lead to the murder of many. The demons, always lazy and looking for a shortcut, started to murder Christian children in other communities before Easter, and the Christians were quick to blame Jews. Over the next few years charges were brought and Jews unjustly executed, and in places riots erupted and led to the deaths of many innocent Jews.

Then, to the Mazzikin’s utter surprise, the crimes crossed over the northern France. The same pattern was happening there, a Christian child discovered and the Jews blamed. But no demon was responsible, it was the Christians doing it all on their own.

The blood libel movement has a life of its own now, with torture, unjust executions, and murderous pogroms an all too common occurrence across north west Europe.

Story Seed - The Nascent Pogrom
In a panic, Miryam, a Jewish mother, comes to the covenant. Her adult son has been accused of murdering a child, along with a dozen other respected members of her community. Tomorrow is Good Friday - she knows the stories - she knows that the Jewish Quarter will be attacked the next day, during a time of religious fervor. She has no one else to turn to, will the magi help? Are they willing to pay a ransom to the mundane authorities to save the condemned men? Will they defend the Jewish Quarter? If they choose to stay out of things, what happens next year, when the emboldened demons decide to kidnap a child from the covenant and murder him, placing blame again on the Jews?

4 Likes

Must a Jew Abstain from Hermetic Magic? A Psak

This really got away from me, so the psak is divided into three parts. This first part covers the question of whether the Order of Hermes are idolaters. Given the very name “Hermes” Jews will have a reflexive dislike of the Order. Idolatry is one of the core prohibitions of Judaism, one of the few things that you must avoid even at the cost of your own life. It is forbidden not just to engage in idolatry, but also to benefit from others doing so.

Part 1 - Idolatry

Mythically Plausible - This post presents a rabbinic opinion - a psak or responsum - as what relationship an observant Jews should have to Hermetic magic. This opinion is intentionally weighted towards leniency to Hermetic magic, because that’s what makes for an interesting story. But it's not an impossible position, and you can imagine it as a persuasive minority ruling, much like how Rabbi Asher’s opinion on the prayer for rain was not adopted, but is still considered a respected opinion. That said, I am aware of no actual halakhic ruling that rules particularly leniently towards sorcerers.

This post is an in-universe text, but it does not hew too closely to the 13th century style so that it might be understandable to a modern audience. A brief citation to the Mishneh Torah and Maimonides (aka Rambam) is given. Maimonides will get his own post, but for now you just need to know that he is a controversial and poorly understood figure in Northern Europe in 1220. Maimonides views on the supernatural are complex, but he generally does not give much credence to the idea that magic can be real. The author of this psak does not like Maimonides, so he uses the obvious existence of Hermetic magic in Mythic Europe to dunk on Rambam.

A psak often has three parts. The question being asked, often a practical question asked by a member of the community, a discussion of the halachic issues that the question brings up, and finally the answer, the psak proper. We start with the question. The discussion will continue across the three posts.

Question

A certain learned woman, honored in our community, approached me with a question of some import to modern scholars. She asks if the practice of Hermetic magic is to be permitted. And if it is not permitted is the prohibition from the Torah or from rabbinic ruling. Further, she asks if it is permitted to consult with goyim who practice Hermetic magic, and thereby benefit from this sorcery. Again, if it is not permitted she wonders where the origin of this prohibition derives.

Discussion

First, I must speak of the nature of the Hermetic sorcerer. This group is surprisingly widespread in our lands, with dozens of their batei sefer in the lands of the Emperor alone. The Rambam, of blessed memory, has written that magic is “emptiness and vanity,” and by this he means that it has no effect. But that could not be further from the truth, and proof, if any more is needed, that his Mishneh Torah is a book lacking in much merit. I myself have seen this goyish magic produce great effects. And my observations are shared with many learned rabbis of our lands as well as with the brilliant young scholar Moses ben Nachman of Andalusia.

The very name of their Order itself seems to indicate a grave danger for any observant person of our community. If this Order of Hermes is a group of idolaters then we must have no dealings with them - not even to speak with them, let alone benefit from and learn their craft. But I have heard testimony from a Jewish member of this Order, who has said that there is no requirement for idolatry in membership. Not only is an observant Jew a member, but it is reported that some of their members are Muslims. Those of the Islamic faith are not idolaters. Christians are untrustworthy in matters of idolatry, but many of them seek to avoid it, and many of these are members of this Order. Finally, there are those who are idolaters worshiping the false Hermes in the Order, but it is possible to avoid that number and any Jew is obligated to do so.

The Order swears an oath that grants membership. If this oath were sworn in an idolatrous way, or in a way that is a desecration of Hashem’s name, then membership would certainly be forbidden. I have reviewed this oath and am happy to report that there is no mention of any forbidden elements. Like some guild oaths, that are permitted for Jews to swear, the Hermetic Oath charges the wizard’s companions to enforce the oath, not any forbidden idol.

Story Seed - The Idolatrous Mystery Cult
Certain Mystery Cults directly deal with matters of idolatry. Hermetic Theurgy calls on daimons, many of whom claim to be gods, and Hermetic Sacrifice is powered by animal sacrifice, on the model of ancient Roman cults, to name two examples. A Jewish magus may feel comfortable in the Order of Hermes, until he is presented with evidence of such a Mystery Cult. A hermetic maga who is an ally of the covenant is discovered to be part of such a Mystery Cult. How will the Jewish magi of the covenant react? Can the ally be persuaded that her behavior in the cult is idolatrous, and does she even care? Will the covenant lose a political ally over the issue?

5 Likes

Must a Jew Abstain from Hermetic Magic? A Psak

This really got away from me, so the psak is divided into three parts. This second part covers the question of what the status of a non-Jewish wizard is. This includes both the basic question of whether such practice is legal in a Jewish sense, but also whether a Jew could benefit from Hermetic magic - by asking a wizard to cast a spell for them, for instance.

Part 2 - Non-Jewish Hermetic Wizards

Mythically Plausible - This post presents a rabbinic opinion - a psak or responsum - as what relationship an observant Jews should have to Hermetic magic. This opinion is intentionally weighted towards leniency to Hermetic magic, because that’s what makes for an interesting story. But it's not an impossible position, and you can imagine it as a persuasive minority ruling, much like how Rabbi Asher’s opinion on the prayer for rain was not adopted, but is still considered a respected opinion. That said, I am aware of no actual halakhic ruling that rules particularly leniently towards sorcerers.

This post is an in-universe text, but it does not hew too closely to the 13th century style so that it might be understandable to a modern audience. Citations are provided by quotation, with no reference to the page of Talmud on which they appear. This is because the standardized page numbers would not be invented for several hundred years, with the adoption of the printing press. A modern reader can look to Leviticus 19, Deuteronomy 18, Sanhedrin 65b, 67a, and 67b for many of the quotations. The text was written by a Rabbi with poor scores (but not nonexistent ones!) in Magic Theory and Order of Hermes lore. So his understanding of the Order and its magic is very imperfect, but hopefully understandable.

A psak often has three parts. The question being asked, often a practical question asked by a member of the community, a discussion of the halachic issues that the question brings up, and finally the answer, the psak proper. This post is the middle part of the discussion.

With questions of idolatry out of the way I turn to the question of sorcery itself. We read “Let no one be found who is an augur, a soothsayer, a diviner, a sorcerer, one who casts spells, or one who consults ghosts or familiar spirits, or one who inquires of the dead.” And further that “you shall not allow a witch to live.” The Torah prohibition is much commented on by our sages.

This leads to the second question I will address - is sorcery prohibited to the nations? There is ample evidence to suggest it is. Our rabbis discuss how a witch is put to death. They derive that a witch of the nations is put to death by decapitation, the method by which non-Jews are executed, but that a witch of the Jewish people is put to death by stoning, the most serious method of execution. But we also learn that since the destruction of the Temple and the scattering of the Jewish people, that no capital punishment may be performed. It requires a beit din of twenty three to pronounce a capital sentence, and no court of sufficient wisdom exists. And so it seems clear that we have no mechanism by which to enforce this commandment upon the nations, and that it is only applicable in the time when the temple is restored.

There are laws by which we do judge the nations in modern times. “The sons of Noah were given seven commandments,” we read in a Tosefta, “courts, idolatry, blasphemy, forbidden sexual relations, bloodshed, theft, and the limb of a living animal”. And Rabbi Shimon says, “on account of sorcery.” The laws of Noah that are required of the nations are from the Torah, while Rabbi Shimon’s prohibition is a rabbinic prohibition only.

Is Rabbi Shimon’s prohibition definitive? Certainly not. We learn from Rabbi Akiva, “A necromancer can prove,” Akiva is willing to use a necromancer to prove the date of Shabbat. And further, “Rav Ḥanina and Rav Oshaya would sit every Shabbat eve … and a third-born calf would be created for them,” by sorcery, ”and they would eat it in honor of Shabbat.” And Rashi, of blessed memory, understands that the third-born calf was especially delicious.

And further, even when the sorcerer is working against our sages these actions are not prohibited by them. “There was a certain woman who was attempting to take dust from under the feet of Rabbi Ḥanina in order to perform sorcery on him and harm him. Rabbi Ḥanina said to her: If you succeed, go and do it. I am not concerned about it, as it is written: “There is none else besides Him.”” In this example we may understand that this certain woman was a sorcerer, and she was attempting to gain what is known as a Connection of Magic to Rabbi Hanina. The sage was not concerned because he knew that great sages have protection from Hashem against magic. This is known as Magic Resistance by the Order of Hermes. Just as this was true in the time of the sages so it is true now.

“Abaye says: The halakhot of sorcery are like the halakhot of Shabbat” And by this he means that certain acts of sorcery may be performed by a goyish sorcerer and a Jew may benefit from these acts. This is derived by analogy, just as in the halakhot of Shabbat there are acts that a Jew may not perform on Shabbat but may benefit from those acts if they are performed by a shabbos goy.

Indeed, our sages knew much about the Order of Hermes, and told us which of them to be cautious of. There are “acts of sorcery, which sorcerers perform themselves, without using demons. And likewise it says: “And the flaming sword that turned every way” The flaming sword refers to the Flambeau, who do not perform evil magic and may be consulted. And “Abaye says: A sorcerer who is particular about using a certain utensil for his sorcery is employing a demon; one who is not particular about using a certain utensil is performing a permitted act of sorcery.” This is referring to the Verditiuis, who use utensils to perform their magic, which is an evil sort of magic. One may not consult with him.

We see that sorcery is not prohibited to the nations. And all the more so, we see that it is permitted to benefit from a goyish sorcerer, though there are many goyish sorcerers that one should be cautious of.

Story Seed - The Noahide Laws
A local Guernicus gets hold of this Psak. She is not Jewish, but finds the laws of Noah to be compelling: to create just courts, a ban on idolatry, blasphemy, forbidden sexual relations, bloodshed, theft, and tearing the limb of a living animal. These seem like some basic principles for a moral life. She moves to have these principles enshrined in the Peripheral code. How will the more traditional Quaesitors feel about this innovation? How does the covenant feel about it?

Story Seed - The Offended Verditius
A local Tytalus secretly has this psak translated and is spreading it around the Tribunal, using her skill with intrigue to keep her hands clean. She plans to supplant the Order’s long memory of the Corruption of the Tytalus with the idea that it is the Verditius who are corrupted, and the psak is only one small stage in her plan. A local Verditius falls for this intrigue. She is deeply offended by the idea that all Verditius are associating with demons and seeks to deal with this Rabbi personally. How will the magi react when the local Jewish Quarter catches fire? How will the intrigue play out at Tribunal? Can the Verditius and the Jewish community be reconciled?

6 Likes

Must a Jew Abstain from Hermetic Magic? A Psak

This really got away from me, so the psak is divided into three parts. This third part covers the question of if a Jew is allowed to practice Hermetic magic, and also provides the final rulings for all three questions addressed in the psak.

Part 3 - Jewish Hermetic Wizards

Mythically Plausible - This post presents a rabbinic opinion - a psak or responsum - as what relationship an observant Jews should have to Hermetic magic. This opinion is intentionally weighted towards leniency to Hermetic magic, because that’s what makes for an interesting story. But it's not an impossible position, and you can imagine it as a persuasive minority ruling, much like how Rabbi Asher’s opinion on the prayer for rain was not adopted, but is still considered a respected opinion. That said, I am aware of no actual halakhic ruling that rules particularly leniently towards sorcerers.

This post is an in-universe text, but it does not hew too closely to the 13th century style so that it might be understandable to a modern audience. Citations are provided by quotation, with no reference to the page of Talmud on which they appear. This is because the standardized page numbers would not be invented for several hundred years, with the adoption of the printing press. A modern reader can look to Sanhedrin 65a, 67a, and 67b for many of the quotations. The text was written by a Rabbi with poor scores (but not nonexistent ones!) in Magic Theory and Order of Hermes lore. So his understanding of the Order and its magic is very imperfect, but hopefully understandable.

A psak often has three parts. The question being asked, often a practical question asked by a member of the community, a discussion of the halachic issues that the question brings up, and finally the answer, the psak proper. This post is the final part of the discussion and the actual psak.

Third and finally, we come to the most difficult question, may a Jew practice sorcery?

We read in Gemara, “Abaye says: The halakhot of sorcery are like the halakhot of Shabbat, in that their actions can be divided into three categories: There are some of them for which one is liable to be executed by stoning, and there are some of them for which one is exempt from punishment by Torah law but they are prohibited by rabbinic law, and there are some of them that are permitted.”

And the Gemera continues, “Abaye elaborates: One who performs a real act of sorcery is liable to be executed by stoning. One who deceives the eyes is exempt from punishment, but it is prohibited for him to do so. What is permitted is to act like Rav Ḥanina and Rav Oshaya: Every Shabbat eve they would engage in the study of the halakhot of creation, and a third-born calf would be created for them, and they would eat it in honor of Shabbat.”

How is this to be understood? Dealing with demons to perform sorcery is prohibited and one is executed by stoning for it. Deceiving the eyes is not permitted, but neither do we punish one for the act. And acts like those of Rav Hanina and Rav Oshaya are permitted.

What is this act of these sages? What do we learn from the fact that this story is repeated twice? The first time the story is stated is to teach that the nations may engage in sorcery, and the second time it is stated is to teach that even the Jews may engage in sorcery, if it is for the right purpose.

It is here that an understanding of Hermetic Magic is useful. These wizards practice five kinds of magic, Creation, Understanding, Change, Destruction, and Control.

Demons cannot practice the magic of Creation, as we learn “Rav Pappa said: By God! They [demons] cannot create even an entity as large as a camel. They do not create anything. Rather, they can gather these large animals, leading them from one place to another.” Demons and the prohibited sorcery is sorcery that cannot create, only deceive someone into thinking they have created. In the same way, there is Hermetic creation magic that is true creation and never fades and Hermetic creation magic that is false and does fade in its time. The former is permitted to the Jewish people.

The Gemara relates that “A man named Yannai arrived at a certain inn. He said to the innkeepers: Give me water to drink. They brought him flour mixed with water. He saw that the lips of the innkeeper woman were moving, and he cast a bit of the drink to the ground, and it turned into scorpions, and he understood that the innkeepers performed sorcery on the drink.” This is the magic of Understanding, which is always permitted because it can be used to save a life.

The story continues, “Yannai said to them: I drank from yours; you too drink from mine, and he also performed sorcery on the drink. He gave it to her to drink and she turned into a donkey. He rode upon her and went to the marketplace.” This is the magic of Change, which is also permitted, but it should only be used righteously.

The magic of Control is more difficult. We have learned that demons use the magic of Control to mimic Creation, by gathering a camel from place to place to pretend as if they have created it. But we learn of Rabbi Eliezar, who knew three thousand halakhot of planting cucumbers by sorcery. Once he spoke with his student, who said to him, “My teacher, teach me about the planting of cucumbers. I said one statement of sorcery, and the entire field became filled with cucumbers. He said to me: My teacher, you have taught me about planting them; teach me about uprooting them. I said one statement and they all were gathered to one place.” This is the magic of Control, which is permitted in certain matters, such as those of planting and harvesting.

But the power of Control has other uses, such as to speak with the dead, and about this the Mishna says, “A necromancer is a pitom from whose armpit the voice of the dead appears to speak.” And Rashi of blessed memory tells us that a pitom is another word for necromancer. “And a sorcerer is one from whose mouth the dead appear to speak. These, the necromancer and the sorcerer, are executed by stoning, and one who inquires about the future through them is in violation of a prohibition.” In this way we learn that the Control of the dead is prohibited.

Our sages do not speak of the magic of Destruction because it is obvious that this is prohibited.

Finally, if more proof were needed, the Gemara finishes its discussion as follows, asking, “How could Rabbi Eliezer have performed that act of sorcery? But didn’t we learn in the mishna that one who performs an act of sorcery is liable? The Gemara answers: Performing sorcery not in order to use it, but in order to teach oneself the halakhot is different, and it is permitted; as the Master says that it is derived from the verse: “You shall not learn to do like the abominations of those nations. There shall not be found among you…one who uses divination, a soothsayer, an enchanter, or a sorcerer”, so that you shall not learn, i.e., it is prohibited for you to learn, in order to do, but you may learn, i.e., it is permitted for you to learn, in order to understand the matter yourself and teach it to others.”

This Hermetic Order exists, above all, to teach and learn, in keeping with the sages' words.

Ruling

Hermetic Sorcerers are not to be understood to be, a priori, idolaters. They do have idolaters among them, so one must be cautious. It is obviously prohibited to associate with an idolater or benefit from idologry, this is a Torah prohibition, and this is no different for the Hermetics than it is for anyone else.

Hermetic Sorcerers who are not Jews are permitted to perform their sorcery, so long as they follow the seven laws given to Noah’s sons. This is a Torah prohibition. Certain Hermetic Sorcerers, such as the Verditius, should be assumed to be working with demons and should be avoided as a fence around the Torah.

Jews are permitted to be Hermetic Sorcerers. It goes without saying that they must continue to follow all of the mitzvot with their sorcery. This is permitted by the Torah, but there are many permissions and prohibitions that come from the Oral Law. The magical acts of Understanding and permanent Creation are kosher. Acts of Control and Change must be considered carefully and a wizard should consult with their local halachic authority. Acts of temporary Creation are prohibited, but not subject to the death penalty. Acts of Destruction are never permitted.

Eitan ben Aaron
Chesvan 4980

Story Seed - Rabbinic Investigation
Another Rabbi Levy ben Asher reads Rabbi Eitan’s psak and finds it abhorrent. How could sorcery be permitted when it is so clearly outlawed by the Torah? He begins to pen a psak of his own, but realizes he knows very little of this Order of Hermes. He recognizes that he has a responsibility investigate these wizards. At first he asks questions to the communities around the covenant, but as his investigation proceeds he may talk to some of the grogs or even some of the magi. How will the magi react to being put under investigation? If magic is inexpertly used to divert Rabbi Levy, what are the consequences if he, for instance, returns home having entirely reversed his position? If Rabbi Levy publishes a screed against the magi will the Quaesitors think that the covenant has endangered their sodales by dealing with the situation clumsily?

4 Likes

Menachem ben Qalonymus

Mythic Plausible - This post describes a fictional character who is partially based on a historical person Qalonymus ben Qalonymus, who was born in 1286. The historical Qalonymus was a member of the prominent Qalonymus family, translator of several works of mathematics and science from Arabic to Hebrew, and the author of a stirring poem that describes his desire to live a woman’s life in a woman’s body. The poem, as translated by Noam Sienna, is included below. It is worth a read as a reminder that ideas about gender have always been fluid, even 700 years ago. The fictional person is less of a scholar and seeks a magical way to change his gender.

The Provence Tribunal contains a thriving Jewish community that is independent from the rest of the Jewish world, though closely connected to the Jews of Spain, Rome, and Africa. They are Sephardic Jews, but with their own traditions. The Qalonymus family are the royalty of this part of the Jewish world, with the head of the family bearing the title of Nasi, or Prince. The family is involved with scholarship, naturally, but also with trade across the Jewish and gentile Mediterranean.

Menachem is a member of this family, though a junior one. He has spent some time in the beit midrash, but has not yet earned the title of hakham, or sage - a Sephardic term for rabbi. He is seen as a quiet and thoughtful young man, though one who is often distracted. He does not have a gift for Jewish study, though he is skilled with languages and has helped his family translate some texts and arrange business dealings with foreign merchants. The truth is that he is a deeply faithful man who is riven with feelings of confusion around gender.

In traditional Judaism men pray, as part of every morning service, “Blessed are you, O Lord, who has not made me a woman.” This prayer causes Menachem anguish every morning, because he does not want to thank Hashem for not being a woman. Indeed, he prays regularly that Hashem would make him a woman, as Hashem changed Dinah in Leah’s womb from male to female. So far his prayers have gone unanswered.

Menachem looks to his sisters and the other female members of his community and sees their lives as blessed. They do not labor under the heavy weight of the 613 commandments, as they are not subject to many of them. They work together with comradery, spinning thread and baking bread. They seem to have secret spaces and private whispered conversations that he wishes he could be a part of. At times he even wonders what it would be like to marry a man - to be provided for while at the same time being able to fulfill the quiet and intimate mitzvah of lighting the Shabbat candles (a traditional women’s observance).

Menachem’s prayers have not been answered, but he does not believe that his desires are against Hashem’s will. After all, Hashem created him with these desires. In reading Rambam he understands that miracles are part of the nature of the universe, and it is not right that a person should want a miracle to happen for him. Instead a person should understand that miracles will happen at the right time, in a way that seems natural. Rambam writes about the parting of the Red Sea and how a wind blew the water so that the sea parted. The wind was a miracle created at the beginning of time, waiting for that moment. In the same way, perhaps, Menachem decided that magic was a miracle that Hashem created that he had the right to seek out.

Menachem set out to find Hermetic Wizards and see if their magic can be used for miraculous purposes: to change him from a man to a woman. He succeeded, but not as he might have hoped. A Jerbition maga named Magdalene took Menachem in. She promised him that she could solve his problem, if he just did her a few favors.

The Jerbition was cursed with a Blatant Gift after a Twilight that went very badly. She needed a mundane agent who could manage her business interests and her connections with the larger merchant community of the Mediterranean. Menachem, with a broad command of languages, seemed a useful tool, especially since he could be strung along with the promise of giving him the transformation he craved.

Magdalene did create the item,a necklace, that Menachem needed, but she only gave it to him for a few hours at a time. She insisted that the necklace stay at the covenant so it would be safe, but also so that Menachem would always be beholden to her. She continuously made promises she did not keep, saying that the next task she had for him would be the last, and he would finally be given the necklace for good. But there was always just one more thing to do.

Eventually Menachem took matters into his own hands, reasoning that he had paid his debt to her a dozen times over. She knew that the necklace was what he wanted, so that was well guarded. But her library was another matter. He stole the text that described how the necklace was made, and a number of other books for good measure. With this stolen bounty, he reasoned, he might be able to make a more balanced deal at a different covenant.

Story Seed - The Thief’s Refuge
Menachem comes to the covenant, knowing that the wizards are not well disposed to Magdalene. He has several useful books, all in Latin, written by Magdalene. These include five Tractati with Quality 11, two in Corpus, two in Animal, and one in Muto. He also has Lab Texts for The Beast Remade, Steed of Vengeance, Cheating the Reaper, The Eye of the Sage, Cloak of Black Feathers, and Curse of Circe. Finally he has the Lab Text for Dina’s Necklace. All the Lab Texts would need translation to be useful. He offers these books to the covenant in exchange for a necklace that will transform him into a woman, such as Magdalene had. The covenant’s course is not entirely clear. If the wizards had stolen Magdalene’s books that would clearly be a crime. Even if they commanded a servant to do so, they would be liable. But Menachem is not at all subject to Order Law. Is it worth taking him in and helping him to benefit from the books and irk an enemy? If Magdalene catches up to Menachem she will certainly kill him, or worse. Will the covenant stand by while a mundane is tormented by a fellow wizard?

Dinah’s Necklace
A small gold necklace holding a garnet on a pendant. The device benefits from the shape and material bonus for jewelry to transform the self of +4. This is a lesser enchanted device with constant effect, for +4 levels), for a total level of 14. A Muto Corpus Lab Total of 28 was needed to create this enchanted device. A total of just 14 is needed to create it with the Lab Text.

Muto Corpus Level 10 - The Transformation of Adam to Eve
R: Touch, D: Sun, T: Ind
The target is transformed to be the opposite sex. Their primary and secondary sex characteristics change - a woman would grow a beard and have a penis, for instance. The target does not gain the ability to have children in their new state - that would violate the Limit of Essential Nature. Just like any constant magical effect, this device causes one point of warping a year if it is worn frequently.
(Base 3, +1 Touch, +2 Sun)

Menachem ben Qalonymus
Characteristics: Int +1, Per +1, Pre +1, Com +2, Str +1, Sta 0, Dex -1, Qik +1
Size: 0
Age: 25 (25)
Decrepitude: 0 (0)
Warping Score: 0 (1)
Confidence Score: 1 (3)
Virtues and Flaws
Free: Wanderer
Virtues: Educated (Hebrew), Well-Traveled, Linguist, Social Contacts (Merchants), Strong-Willed, Puissant Bargain
Flaws: Outsider (Major), Close Family Ties (Qalonymus Family), Driven (Minor), Pious (Minor)
Personality Traits: Driven to Become a Woman +3, Faithfully Jewish +3, Suspicious of magi +2, Quiet +2
Reputations: None.
Combat:
Dodging: Init +1, Atk n/a, Def -1, Dam n/a
Soak: 0 (Stamina)
Fatigue Levels: OK, 0, –1, –3, –5, Unconscious
Wound Penalties: –1 (1–5), –3 (6–10), –5 (11–15), Incapacitated (16–20)
Abilities:
Artes Liberales 1 (bookkeeping), Montpellier Lore 1 (Jews), City of Rome Lore 1 (Jews), Provence Lore 1 (Jews), Awareness 4 (night), Bargain 4+2 (shipping), Charm 3 (foreigners), Etiquette 3 (Jews), Folk Ken 3 (deals), Guile 3 (deals), Legerdemain 1 (books), Language: Ladino 2 (business), Language: Zarphatic 5 (poetry), Language: Occitan 4 (business), Language: Latin 3 (bargaining), Language: Arabic 4 (business), Language: Hebrew 3 (Torah), Language: Italian 2 (business), Language: Lingua Franca 2 (Western), Order of Hermes Lore 1 (Jerbiton), Stealth 3 (cities), Rabbinic Law 2 (business deals)
Equipment: Leger, pocket knife, stolen books.
Encumbrance: 0 (0)
Customization Notes: Menachem can take another four points of Virtues and Flaws. Menachem has not taken the Transvestite flaw, as he does not present as a member of a gender that does not match his physical sex. The Driven flaw is used to describe his desire to change his physical sex through magical means. Only when his physical sex is changed does he feel comfortable inhabiting a matching gender presentation. Note that our 2024 understanding of gender is very different from what someone in 1220 might have, but you can look to examples of gender queer people in the middle ages, such as the historical Qalonymus ben Qalonymus to guide your roleplaying.

Poem by Qalonymus ben Qalonymus

1322

Translated by Noam Sienna in A Rainbow Thread

What an awful fate for my mother,
that she bore a son. What a loss of all benefit!
Cursed be the one who announced to my father: "It’s a boy!"
Woe to him who has male sons.
Upon them a heavy yoke has been placed, restrictions and constraints,
some in private, some in public,
some to avoid the mere appearance of violation,
and some entering the most secret of places.
Strong statutes and awesome commandments,
six hundred and thirteen.
Who is the man who can do all that is written,
so that he might be spared?

Oh, but had the artisan who made me
created me instead—a fair woman.
Today I would be wise and insightful.
We would weave, my friends and I,
and in the moonlight spin our yarn,
and tell our stories to one another, from dusk till midnight.
We’d tell of the events of our day, silly things,
matters of no consequence.
But also I would grow very wise from the spinning,
and I would say, "Happy is she who knows how to work with combed
flax and weave it into fine white linen."

And at times, in the way of women,
I would lie down on the kitchen floor,
between the ovens, turn the coals, and taste the different dishes.
On holidays I would put on my best jewelry.
I would beat on the drum
and my clapping hands would ring.
And when I was ready and the time was right,
an excellent youth would be my fortune.
He would love me, place me on a pedestal.
Dress me in jewels of gold,
earrings, bracelets, necklaces.
And on the appointed day,
in the season of joy when brides are wed,
for seven days would the boy increase my delight and gladness.
Were I hungry, he would feed me with well-kneaded bread.
Were I thirsty, he would quench me with light and dark wine.
He would not chastise nor harshly treat me,
and my pleasure he would not diminish.
Every Sabbath, and each new moon,
his head would rest upon my breast.
The three husbandly duties he would fulfill,
rations, raiment, and regular intimacy.

And three wifely duties would I also fulfill,
[watching for menstrual] blood, [Sabbath candle] lights, and bread.

Father in heaven, who did miracles for our ancestors with fire and water,
You changed the fire of Chaldees so it would not burn hot,
You changed Dinah in the womb of her mother to a girl,
You changed the staff to a snake before a million eyes,
You changed [Moses’] hand to [leprous] white,
and the sea to dry land.
In the desert you turned rock to water,
hard flint to a fountain.
Who would then turn me from a man to woman?
Were I only to have merited this, being so graced by goodness.
What shall I say? Why cry or be bitter?
If my Father in heaven has decreed upon me
and has maimed me with an immutable deformity,
then I do not wish to remove it.
And the sorrow of the impossible
is a human pain that nothing will cure
and for which no comfort can be found.

So, I will bear and suffer
until I die and wither in the ground.
And since I have learned from our tradition
that we bless both the good and the bitter,
I will bless in a voice, hushed and weak,
Blessed are you, O Lord,
who has not made me a woman.

3 Likes

Captured by the Bird Headed Jews

Mythic Historical - This post is based on the Bird Head Haggadah, the earliest surviving Ashkenazi hagadah. A haggadah is the book that describes the practice of the Passover seder. In the 21st century Jews read from the haggadah at home on the first two nights of Pesach. Created around 1300, this haggadah depicts the practices surrounding passover as well as the story of the Exodus from Egypt. All the Jewish people in the book are shown with bird heads. The modern explanation for the bird headed figures in the book’s art work is the Jewish prohibition on depicting images of humans. But in Mythic Europe perhaps this book should be taken more literally.

In the forests of Southern Germany live a curious group of Faeries. These creatures look human, except that they have the heads of birds, generally with long curved beaks and feathery flowing hair. When Christians attacked a nearby Jewish village on Passover a young girl, Chaya ben Avram, fled into the woods, and encountered the faeries. Chaya told the Faeries the story of the Exodus from Egypt and the Faeries understood the power of the story. This incident created a regio in the woods, and Faeries abduct passers by every Passover to recreate the story, drawing their power from this human story.

The magi learn that travelers have been disappearing from a nearby road when it winds its way through the woods. A group of covenant grogs carrying valuable goods are the latest to disappear, and it seems that an expedition must be sent to retrieve them. The party finds the Faerie regio, and must pass through the Faerie’s trials to escape. While the historical bird headed Jews are found in the art of Southern Germany, this story is so fanciful that it could be moved anywhere in Mythic Europe with little trouble. This could be run as a somewhat “on rails” introductory adventure to the more fantastical elements of Mythic Europe, as well as a good reason to incorporate Jewish stories into a saga.

The regio entrance is under an archway of branches. Naturally it opens only at night and only during the the eight nights of Passover. Otherwise the party will have to find a way to see into the regio, either with Second Sight, Magical Sensitivity, or a spell. Once they can see into it they can enter it. The regio has several levels, the first with a Faerie aura of 3, and increasing by 1 as they go deeper into it. The levels can only be accessed one at a time; once the party enters a level there is no going back, only forward. Each level plays out a different part of the Pesach story, as seen through the eyes of a nine year old.

Upon entering the regio the party will find themselves in a harsh desert dressed as Israelite slaves. Their normal possessions have not been taken, but changed, so that a suit of armor has become tattered rags and a magic wand has become a twisted walking stick. Their possessions are useless for their usual purpose while they are transformed this way. This is Faerie Terram based enchantment with a Penetration of 10 + a stress die, so some characters will be able to resist it. As the party enters the regio they hear a booming voice pronounce words of Hebrew.

“B'chol dor vador chayav adom lir'ot et-atzmo ke'illu hu yatza mi-mitzrayim”

Anyone who understands the language knows that it is from the hagaddah

“In every generation each person must think of himself as having personally left Egypt.”

First Level - Faerie Aura 3 - “And the Egyptians Dealt Cruelly With Us”
The first level depicts the hard labor of the Israelites in Egypt. The party will find that they are being forced to labor by bird headed Egyptian taskmasters wielding whips. These are Faeries with a Might of 5 whose whips have Init +4, Attack +7, Defense +3, Damage +4 and Soak +3. A whip never does more damage than a Light Wound with a single hit. There are as many Faeries as there are party members. The characters may fight the taskmastrers or they may submit and do the labor. They are expected to build a stone storehouse, which requires a day’s hard labor. Each character should make three Stamina + Athletics rolls of 9+, with each failure costing a long term fatigue level, to build the storehouse. Alternatively they can use magic to build it, or find some other creative solution. Once the faeries are defeated or the storehouse built the next level of the regio opens.

Second Level - Faerie Aura 4 - “Blood, Frogs, Lice, Wild Animals, Pestilence, Boils, Hail, Locusts, Darkness, Death of the Firstborn”
The second level shows the preparations that the Israelites undertook in order to escape from Egypt. The hot desert sun is setting over the slave houses that the Israelites live in. Their taskmasters are nowhere to be found. Indeed, as the sun sets the party is treated to a view of the miraculous plagues as they rain down on the Egyptians in their cities far in the distance. Some fellow bird headed Israelites - again Faeries with Might 5 - will rush up to them and tell them that they need to bake their bread and mark their doors with goat blood, and that there is no time to waste. The party must quickly bake matzo - unleavened bread - which can be done with a Dexterity + Profession (Chef) roll of 6+. Magic can, of course, help as well. More importantly they must find a goat, slaughter it, and paint its blood on door frames of their slave houses. If the party neglects this important task an Intelligence + Theology roll of 6+ should be allowed for each character so they can remember the task and the deadly consequences of failing to do it. This part of the story ends when the sun sets and the angel of death passes over the houses. Any first born party member who is not in a house marked with blood must make a Stamina roll of 12+ or die. This effect has Penetration of 20 + a stress die and is a Corpus effect.

Third Level - Faerie Aura 5 - “He Split the Sea for Us and Brought Us Through It On Dry Land”
The third level shows the Israelites trapped at the edge of the Red Sea, with the Egyptian army, mounted on chariots, crashing down upon them. The sea before them begins to part, and the party must flee or be attacked by thousands of bird headed Egyptian soldiers. These are, again, Faeries with Might 5, but the heavily armed and armored Egyptians have Init +3, Attack +15, Defense +15, Damage +10 and Soak +10. There are thousands of them - this is not a battle that can be won. The party must escape through the parted sea, with each member making three Quickness + Athletics rolls. On failure they are subject to a single attack by an Egyptian charioteer. Magic may be used to travel quickly, deflect these attacks, or in other creative ways. After three rounds of flight the party reaches the other side, and the sea comes crashing down on their pursuers, ending this part of the story.

Fourth Level - Faerie Aura 6 - “He Drew Us Close Around Mount Sinai and Gave Us The Torah”
The fourth level seems, at first, as a relief. The party finds themselves on the slopes of a tall mountain. High above they can see thick clouds and a golden light peaking through the clouds. There is nothing below them, the natural course is to climb, and that is the only way the story can proceed. At the top they find a burning bush surrounded by glowing light. This form may seem Divine, but it is, in fact, the Faerie leader of this regio. He goes by the name “Hashem.” Hiding in the shadows is the nine year old girl Chaya, characters can notice her with a Perception + Awareness roll of 6+. Hashem announces that the party has personally experienced the story of the exodus from Egypt, and now they must wander the desert for 40 years.

The party should have a chance to object to this, though Hashem is unpersuaded by any arguments. This is how the story goes, after all. Chaya is a more likely avenue of persuasion. The girl is frightened and wants to go home. She isn’t sure how long she’s been here, but it's certainly long enough. She told this “Hashem” the story of Pesach and then everything quickly got out of hand. She has seen several groups of people, including the covenant’s unfortunate grogs, pass through these trials. She knows that they are all wandering the Faerie desert and will be for many decades to come. She is frightened of “Hashem,” it is wrong to defy God, and she does not want to tell him that he’s doing the wrong thing. Some Charm, Leadership, and Folk Ken rolls of 9+ can get this story out of Chaya and persuade her that “Hashem” is not god - something she’s already inclined to believe. Only once Chaya is on their side can the party persuade “Hashem” to let them go, perhaps with an argument that the story isn’t really a good one if they don’t actually leave the regio.

An alternate course the party could take would be to fight “Hashem” He has a Faerie Might of 20 and a Soak of +2. He is immune to physical damage and to fire, but can be harmed by cold and water. Throwing a skin of water on him does +10 damage, and more impressive Creo Aquam effects will be even more effective - assuming they can penetrate. The challenge is that the characters have very little equipment because of the transformation when they entered the regio.

“Hashem” has no ability to attack, but once he gets bored or once the party attacks him he will start to transport the party to the next level of the regio. This is a Muto Vim effect with Penetration 10 + a stress die. It targets one character a round. If they are successfully affected then they are transported to the next level of the regio.

Fifth Level - Faerie Aura 7 - “Had He Given Us the Torah Without Bringing us to the Land of Israel, It Would Have Been Enough.”
The final level of the regio is the desert of Sinai. Once transported here a character must wander for forty years before they are released from the regio. The poor living conditions of the desert provide a -2 penalty to Aging rolls. The character had better hope that their companions can rescue them.

Back in the fourth level, if “Hashem” is defeated or persuaded then the regio collapses. All the characters in it, both the party of adventurers, their wayward grogs, the two dozen or so other unfortunates who have been trapped by the faeries, and the girl Chaya are expelled into the forest. Five pawns of Rego vis, in the form of the task master’s whips, and five pawns of Muto vis, in the form of desert sand, can also be found at the entrance.

Story Seed - Chaya ben Avram
The girl who started this all has no family to return to, and, in any case, is in no condition to be reintegrated into society after her strange experience. She has been in the regio for at least a year, and has acquired the Faerie Upbringing flaw. She is also Gifted. Chaya can be played in a number of ways to suit the needs of a player character seeking an apprentice. She might be fascinated by her experience and want to learn more about it, making her a good fit for a Merinita or Bonisagus magus. Or she might be driven to punish the fae to make sure this does not happen again, making her a good fit for a Flameau, Tremere, or Tytalus magus. Or she might be interested in learning more about stories and people, making her a good fit for a Jerbition. Or your troupe may find another way to portray her entirely. No matter what, she is Jewish and that faith is an important part of her character, which may lead to interesting stories for her future parens.

6 Likes

Josef ben Yitzhak, Bored City Guard

Mythicly Plausible - This post describes a Jewish soldier. Later in the Middle Ages Jews started to be forbidden to carry weapons, but in 1220 they served as members of the town militia, mercenaries, and even (extremely rarely) knights. For instance, the below is from the front matter of a siddur from Worms dated to c. 1300.

The city of Worms, like many medieval cities, maintains a small professional guard. This guard is responsible for keeping the peace and serving as the backbone of the civilian militia who are called up in times of crisis. The guard and militia are pulled from the different communities of the city, with the general principle that each community should be responsible for policing and defending its own population.

Josef’s father Yitzhak is a moderately well off cobbler in Worms, with a handful of sons. As is the duty of every Jewish father, he paid for the education of his sons at the local beit midash. Moses, the eldest, was a fair student who, upon reaching the age of 18, married and returned to his father’s shop. Shimshon, the middle son, excelled at the beit midrash and was accepted as a student of a local rabbi, to the great honor of his family. Josef, the youngest, was drummed out of school at the age of ten, never having even grasped the needed skills in Hebrew.

The problem is not that Josef is a poor student - though that is certainly true - the problem is that Josef was far more interested in visiting the practice ground where the guard trains. Yitzhak eventually threw up his hands and accepted the inevitable, allowing the boy to join the Jewish component of the guard.

Josef was at least willing to attend trainings with the guard, though he found the actual work of standing a post to be dreadfully dull. He did have a knack for thumping a drunkard on the head. And when a local lord made war on Worm’s bishop Josef distinguished himself in the siege. After a mine collapsed the tower that Joseph was defending, killing everyone in the tower except him some said that Joseph was under Hashem’s protection. Yitzahk said that Hashem didn’t know who Joseph was, any more than Joseph know who Hashem was. The boy was just lucky.

After the siege a long period of peace put Josef to the test, which he failed. He took to the road, looking for adventure. Joseph his hired by the covenant, who has recently lost a member of the turb and is looking for a replacement. The covenant has less concern for his Jewish faith than most employers. And Joseph is excited to learn more about these strange wizards and face down mythic threats.

Josef ben Yitzhak
Characteristics: Int -3, Per -1, Pre +1, Com +1, Str +2, Sta +2, Dex +2, Qik +2
Size: 0
Age: 23 (23)
Decrepitude: 0 (0)
Warping Score: 0 (0)
Confidence Score: 1 (3)
Virtues and Flaws
Free: Covenfolk
Virtues: Warrior, Puissant Single Weapon, Luck
Flaws: Outsider (Minor), Reckless, Poor Student
Personality Traits: Brave +5, Does not eat pork +3, Keeps Shabbat well enough +3, Impatient +3, Suspicious of the Evil Eye +2, Dislikes Christians +1.
Reputations: Jewish -2.
Combat:
Dodging: Init +1, Atk n/a, Def +6, Dam n/a
Fist: Init +1, Atk +5, Def +5, Dam +2
Club: Init +2, Atk +12, Def +11, Dam +5
Short Spear: Init +3, Atk +13, Def +11, Dam +7
Javelin: Init +1, Atk +9, Def +7, Dam +7
Soak: 8 (Partial Chain & Stamina)
Fatigue Levels: OK, 0, –1, –3, –5, Unconscious
Wound Penalties: –1 (1–5), –3 (6–10), –5 (11–15), Incapacitated (16–20)
Abilities: Worms Lore 2 (Jewish community), Athletics 3 (running), Awareness 2 (guard duty), Brawl 3 (dodging), Carouse 3 (Purim), Charm 1 (young women), Craft: Shoes 2 (repair), Folk Ken 1 (Christians), Language: Yiddish 5 (military terminology), Rabbinic Law 1 (Shabbat), Stealth 2 (In armor), Hebrew 2 (Torah), Single Weapon 6+2 (spear), Thrown Weapon 5 (javelin)
Equipment: Short Spear, Javelin x 2, Partial Chain Mail.
Encumbrance: 1 (7)
Customization Notes: Josef’s background could be changed to almost anywhere else in Mythic Europe. In the Rhine Yiddish is the appropriate language. If the covenant is in Normandy or Provence he would speak Zarphatic (a Hebrew / French language). In Iberia he would speak Ladino. In other Tribunals he would speak the local vernacular. Magi are unlikely to speak the Jewish languages, but a German, French, or Spanish speaker can communicate with a speaker of the corresponding Jewish language at -2. Joseph would not fit well with Christian Iberia or the Levant, where Jews were denied many privileges, but would work in Islamic Iberia or the Levant. If he were from an Islamic region his name might use “ibn” rather than “ben”

Story Seed - The New Grog
Joseph is a grog, and as such he should not be the focus of stories. He could be introduced by a troupe if their covenant has recently had some casualties in the turb. The next story would simply include Joseph, who has been hired by the turb captain during downtime. Joseph is likely to generate trouble for the covenant when he charges into battle, in the grand tradition of grogs from time immemorial. Joseph may also generate some moments of humor when he refuses to eat the pork given to the grogs as rations or when he fails to report for duty on Shabbat. A magus utilizing the Curse of Circe on him would be a particularly ignoble punishment.

2 Likes

Drunk as a Rabbi on Purim

Mythic Historical - this post describes the historical practice of Purim in Europe, but gives it a Mythic spin to make it more interesting in a saga. Jews take note! The Purim traditions you are familiar with, such as groggers, costumes, and even hamantaschen, are post-medieval inventions.

Purim, celebrating the events of the Book of Esther, is the most joyous holiday of the Jewish year, generally happening in February or March. The key mitzvah of the holiday is hearing the reading of the scroll of Esther, Megillat Esther. The story, in short, is about Esther and her uncle Mordichai. Esther, a Jewish woman, marries king Ahasuerus. Then the king’s minister, Haman, threatens to kill all the Jews of Persia. Mordichai convinces Esther to use her position to save her people from the evil minister, and Haman is defeated.

Purim is a curious holiday, not focused on synagogue prayer or a family meal, but on public celebration. As well, Megillat Esther is the only book of the Hebrew Bible to make no mention of Hashem. Perhaps it is this, along with the focus on storytelling during the holiday, that causes this Purim to be a high point for faerie influence in Jewish communities.

Where rabbis can keep a close eye on things the halakhic practices of Purim predominate, and these enhance the Divine Aura of Jewish communities. Jews give gifts of food and money to the poor of the community. They hear the reading of the stroll. And they have a festive meal.

But in villages that have no rabbi, or in towns where the community takes the holiday for itself, other folks traditions predominate.

The oldest of these, mentioned in the Talmud and celebrated in 1220 as well, is the tradition of drinking so heavily that you cannot tell the difference between the phrase “blessed is Mordochai” and “cursed is Haman.” As you can imagine, this is the root cause of many celebrations getting out of hand.

There are several other ways the Jews of 1220 celebrate the Purim. Some blot out Haman’s name, by writing it on rocks and then smashing them together or by writing it on the soles of their shoes and letting it rub off as they walk. Other communities, especially in France, alter the tradition of feeding the poor to instead give food to their Christian servants, such as nurses. An especially popular custom is to hold off color performances that include inventing songs to popular tunes and performing skits that mock the local authorities, both Jewish and goyish. Many communities practice all of these customs as well, and when they do the Divine Aura in the community recedes and a Faerie Aura of 1 or 2 emerges, starting at sundown when the holiday starts and lasting until sundown the next night.

Any of these practices can be adapted into a vis source, but a common source is The Last Glass of Wine. Strong wine is needed to fulfill the mitzvah of getting good and drunk. Late at night the most enthusiastic celebrants down glass after glass, until only one person is left with the ability to hold a glass. This Last Glass of Wine contains Herbam vis. Commonly the glass is simply drunk or spilled, and the vis is lost. But if a covenant member can keep it together to become the last one standing then they can bring home the vis.

Harvesting from this source requires overcoming two challenges. First, someone needs to join the celebration. A Jew can do this with no trouble, but a non-Jew must make a Presence + Charm roll of 15+ to be allowed to participate. Second, Jew or gentile alike will need to make a Stamina + Carouse roll of 12+ to be the last one standing. Someone who can pass both these hurdles collects the vis. (See COV5 page 72 for recommendation on how much vis this source might give in your saga).

Story Seed - The Goyish Covenant
The covenant finds out about The Last Glass of Wine and wants to collect from it. Like most covenants they do not have a Jewish member. Non-Jews are not welcome at Purim celebrations, or any Jewish celebration. The Jews are suspicious of outsiders, especially when their Purim skits might be mocking a local lord. To get regular access to this vis source the covenant will need to solve this problem. Will the covenant use magic to disguise their grog as a Jew? Will they use magic to mind control a local with a high tolerance into saving them the Last Cup? Or will they take the time to form a meal relationship with the Jewish community?

1 Like

The Controversial Maimonides

Mythic Historical - This post describes Maimonides as he was understood in historic 1220. This is extended to describe how Maimonides legacy may change mythic kabalisim in the hundred years after 1220.

Moses ben Maimon, also known as Maimonides or Rambam is the most revered figure of the last thousand years of Jewish thought. “From Moses to Moses there was no one like Moses,” is a common saying today, meaning that Rambam is the greatest Jewish thinker after Moses, the author of the Torah, himself. In 1220, on the other hand, Rambam is a controversial figure, who divides the Jewish world. Rambam died in 1204, and his legacy is still being grappled with in 1220. Many of his works are only just now being translated into Hebrew from Arabic, and this scarcity of sources makes the arguments even more thorny. His detractors criticize him on three main fronts:

First, his work combines Aristotelianism and an early scientific mindset with Judaism. Rambam seeks to explain biblical wonders, as far as possible, in accordance with the laws of nature.

Where the Torah recounts the parting of the Red Sea with “The LORD drove back the sea with a strong east wind all that night, and turned the sea into dry ground,” Rambam understands that as meaning that the strong east wind, part of the natural created world, drove back the sea. Generally, he argues that the “miracles” that are described in Torah are part of the natural world, just the language of the Torah often obscures this truth. His detractors argue that this leaves no place for Hashem. But Rambam would argue that Hashem, as the creator of the world, created these natural interactions that create supernatural results. In this way the “miracle” is even more impressive in that it was baked into the universe during its creation.

Second, he seeks to put the rabbis out of a job. His Mishneh Torah is intended to be a summary of all the laws of Judaism such that a Jew can observe Judaism perfectly using just this text. He cuts out the previous thousand years of debate and jumps straight to the answer. Many rabbis, whose passion is that debate, see that as an attempt to put them out of work - which it is. The title of the work doesn’t help, meaning “Repetition of the Torah”. It's a title full of hubris, as if the Mishneh Torah can replace the original Torah.

Third, he introduces his 13 principles of faith - a credo of beliefs, which Judaism has never really had before. Some of these are controversial for some Jews - the incorporality of Hashem is a very Aristotelian view of God which is contradicted at many points in the Torah. The resurrection of the dead and the nature of afterlife (if there is one) is an actively debated question in the Jewish world. As well, even though Rambam included it in his principles of faith, many Jews read him as accepting a sort of watered down metaphorical eternity of the soul, rather than a true resurrection in the World to Come. His views on the topic are sufficiently opaque that someone looking to disagree with him can find a passage that seems to be controversial.

Jewish communities are divided when it comes to dealing with Rambam’s works. In Iberia the more mystical kabalists reject his dismissal of miracles, while the philosophers already familiar with Arabic thought are eager to adopt Rambam as one of their own. In Provance the school of Abraham ben David rejects what they see as the arrogance of Rambam for not including citations in his works, and they work to correct this oversight. And Rambam is most controversial in France and Germany, where his rejection of the interpretive work of sages seems a direct challenge to the tradition of the Tosafists.

For the last fifteen years, since Rambam’s death and the translation of his Guide for the Perplexed into Hebrew, the controversy has simmered. It will not boil over again until 1230 when, in the north, the rabbinic authorities ban philosophy all together. In Provence his detractors get the Church involved, by associating Rambam’s philosophy with the Cathar heresy. This leads to the burning of Rambam’s works by Dominicans in 1232, at which point the Jewish world realizes some have gone too far by involving the Christian authorities. The controversy will continue, and eventually Rambam’s philosophical approach to Judaism triumphs. By 1300 Aristotelian philosophy is an important part of mainstream Judaism and of magical kabalist practice.

But in 1220 the wisdom revealed by Rambam is still being evaluated. Some kabalists, informed by the same Arabic traditions that Rambam learned from, believe there are truths to be found in Rambam. They are attempting to synthesize Kabbalah with Rambam, and create something more powerful from the combination by drawing both on a mystical understanding of Hashem and a deep understanding of the natural world. Kabalists have their own system for Original Research, which I won’t try to create mechanics for here, on the assumption that very few kabalists are actually played as PCs. Part of this work involves seeking for unique Philosophiae texts, each of which can be used to try to create a Breakthrough by synthesizing it with Rambam’s work.

The ultimate goal of this research is allowing kabalists to add the Philosophiae skill to their totals when using kabalist abilities. This would be a Minor Supernatural Virtue. In your saga some kabalists might already have this virtue, and are seeking a second Breakthrough that fully integrates this with their tradition without needing the virtue.

New Minor Supernatural VIrtue - Kabalist Philosophy
The kabalist adds their Philosophiae Ability score to any use of their Gematria, Kabbalah, and Merkavah Abilities. This bonus from Philosophiae may not exceed the base Ability score. This virtue is not available until the corresponding Breakthrough is created by kabalist researchers.

Story Seed - The Curious Kabalist
Ibrahim al-Yehudi, Kabalist from from Iberia is seeking lesser known works of Philosophiae to aid in his research efforts. He is a student of the noted kabalist Azriel of Gerona, who incorporates Neoplatonic thought into his magical efforts. Ibrahim has struggled to get much help from Christian scholars, because of their prejudices, so he turns to the Order of Hermes - and the saga’s covenant - for assistance. Most Greek and Arabic works are available to Ibrahim and his master, but Christian works by authors like St. Augustine, Boethius, Peter Abelard, Isidore of Seville are of great interest to him (see Art and Academe p 26 & 136-139). Unique works of philosophy created by Hermetic magi are even more interesting. The question is what the covenant will get out of the deal. Ibrahim is capable of notable feats such as creating a golem, but he certainly will not use his magic for non-kosher purposes. Perhaps the covenant can convince him to allow them to study his magic? Perhaps he has books to trade that will be of use to the covenant? How do things go wrong when a rival kabalist involves the local Church authorities - trying to stop this heretical synthesis of the holy and the mundane?

3 Likes

Yetzer Hara and Yetzer HaTov

Historical - This post describes the philosophical concepts of the evil and good inclinations, and translates them into Ars Magica mechanics.

The yetzer hara and the yetzer hatov are the two inclinations or desires that exist in all people, according to Jewish thought. The yetzer hara is the inclination towards evil, transgressing the laws of the Torah, while the yetzer hatov is the inclination towards good and fulfilling the mitzvot. Human beings are unique because they have both the yetzer hara and the intelligence to challenge it. Animals have the evil inclination, but no intelligence to stop themselves from doing wrong. Angels have intelligence, but no evil inclination. Only humans have been given both the capacity for evil and the capacity to overcome that inclination by Hashem.

To a Christian observer the concept of the yetzer hara seems like original sin. This is not really the case. The yetzer hara is a necessary part of creation, and its existence is ultimately good.

The Torah relates “And God saw all that had been made, and found it very good.” The Talmud expounds on this, saying that when Hashem found the created universe to be good, Hashem found both that the yetzer hatov was good, but also that the yetzer hara was good. A sage explains “Were it not for the evil inclination, a man would never build a house, would never marry a wife, would never beget children, and would never engage in commerce.”

In Talmudic legend the rabbis capture the yetzer hara so that it will not trouble the world, but come to realize that this was a mistake. Chickens lay no eggs in Israel because the yetzer hara of procreation does not exist. The sages see this as the warning sign that it is, and decide to wound the yetzer hara and release it back into the world.

Having a powerful yetzer hara is not an indication that you are a bad person. The sages write “Anyone who is greater than another, his evil inclination is greater than his.” A great person has a powerful yetzer hara, but a great person will also work hard to overcome his evil inclination.

The particular areas where a character struggles to combat his yetzer hara are often covered by Personality flaws. But some Jewish individuals have a special relationship to their inclinations in general that can be covered by new virtues and flaws.

New Minor Personality Flaw - Powerful Yetzer HaTov
As Ben Azzai said: “Run to perform even a minor mitzvah.” You have a strong inclination to perform mitzvot. You start with a Personality Trait of Yetzer HaTov +3. Whenever you are confronted with the opportunity to perform a mitzvah in a dangerous situation you make a roll against your Yetzer HaTov score instead of a personality trait such as Brave. On a success you rush into the situation despite the danger. This tends to get you in trouble in social situations as well, and makes it impossible for you to conceal your Judaism from others. On the other hand, you get a +3 bonus to rolls to resist being coerced into transgressing against Jewish Law.

New Minor Personality Flaw - Powerful Yetzer Hara
Hashem has given you the challenge of managing a powerful evil inclination. You easily fall into transgression. In addition you start with a level 2 Reputation with other Jews for being a lax in your observance.

Story Seed - The Missing Yetzer Hara
A local kabalist, Meir ben Yochai, has used his power to bind the yetzer hara of everyone in the vicinity of the covenant. This was done with Merkeva Adjuration Holy Magic, first to summon the embodiment of the yetzer hara and then to bind it into a lead box he has created for this purpose. The Aegis of the Hearth of the covenant protects its inhabitants from this effect, but the covenant becomes aware when the grogs reports that nearby villagers are abstaining from drink, not milking their cows, and even failing to cook food or draw water. This is a potentially catastrophic act and people will soon die of thirst and hunger, since they have no inclination to satisfy those needs. Once the kabalist is located he can likely be easily dealt with by Hermetic Magic, but first the covenant will have to figure out what is going on.

1 Like

Miraculous Kol Nidre

Mythic Historical - The practices and legends around Kol Nidre are historical, though of course the mythic effects are not.

Yom Kippur, the Day of Atonement, is the holiest day of the Jewish year and falls in September or October. The theme of the day is repentance - it is a chance to repent from sins against Hashem and to reflect and ask forgiveness from others for sins against your fellows. The halakic practice, in addition to many hours of prayer, is to refrain from eating or drinking from sundown to sundown - twenty five long hours when Jews emulate the practices of angels and seek to be closer to Hashem.

Divine Auras in Jewish communities are strongest on Yom Kippur, climbing as high as five or six at key moments of the service when the whole community is in prayer. A key point of the service is the very the start, Kol Nidre

Kol Nidre is the annulment of vows. Judaism is very concerned with vows because vowing by Hashem is binding and very difficult to break. Many acts of speech can be considered vows - it is easy to accidentally swear a halachically binding vow. As a safety valve, of sorts, the Kol Nidre was created, which cancels vow.

The exact language and custom varies across the Jewish world, and is a subject of halakhic innovation in 1220. The earliest language annuls vows “from last Yom Kippur until this one,” retroactively canceling vows. The Tosafists have changed that to a future looking “from this Yom Kippur until the next,” which cancels vows that will be sworn, preventing them from taking halakhic effect.

This is a much debated issue - in general France and Germany have adopted this new language while Spain, Provance, and Italy retain the old language. But there is a great deal of regional variation - some communities use both formulations as they repeat the phrase three times. Others repeat the annulment up to seven times, or only two, mixing and matching the exact phrasing. Sages agree that the Tosafists are halachically correct - the annulment of a vow can’t happen without a Jewish court. But the populace tends to prefer the retroactive variation, and they resist the halakhic correctness of their rabbis.

Kol Nidre is a powerful and miraculous time. The theme of annulment of vows extends to general renewal and starting anew. Jewish characters who attend Kol Nidre services may find that any ongoing magical effects they are under are miraculously canceled.

Kol Nidre Miracles
Using the Dispel magic, infernal, or faerie effects guideline (RoPD 48) with Adjuration Merkavah has a +6 bonus during the Kol Nidre service. Even those without Holy Magic may find magical effects they labor under canceled. At congregations that use retroactive formulation fo Kol Nidre the Each Jewish congregation at services may roll a stress die + the Divine Aura (generally 6) + Judaic Lore + 6 if they have True Faith.
Botch, you gain your choice of the Powerful Yetzer Hara or Powerful Yetzer HaTov flaw for the next year.
18+ Any bargains you have struck with a creature with Faerie, Magical, or Infernal might are canceled.
24+ Any detrimental ongoing effects you are subject to with Faerie, Magical, or Infernal sources are canceled.
A Jewish Merinita with a Faerie Familiar (if such a character exists) should be cautious going to Kol Niedre!

1 Like

Not to go on too much of a tangent but in medieval Christian theology this sounds to me more like John Duns Scotus' "dual affections" than original sin. The affection for advantage (good-for-me) and the affection for justice (good-in-itself) are also both seen by him as good, though he thinks the latter should govern the former. He also understands the latter principally in terms of obeying the will of God, which seems to tie in well to your presentation here. I wouldn't be surprised if the Jewish notion had entered Christian thought at some point, inspiring this.

1 Like

Interesting! I have no familiarity with John Duns Scotus. I spent all my seasons on Rabbinic Law rather than Theology (Christian). Neat connection, thanks.

1 Like